Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
Second, the drainage of the Lesser arch may have been imposed upon it by
planation at a very late stage of the degradation. Whatever was the
origin of the arches, and whatever was the depth of cover which they
sustained, the Greater is certain to have been a center of drainage from
the time of its formation. When it was first lifted it became a drainage
center because it was an eminence; and afterward it remained an eminence
because it was a drainage center. When in the progress of the denudation
its dikes were exposed, their hardness checked the wear of the summit
and its eminence became more pronounced. It was perhaps at about this
time that the last of the Cretaceous rocks were removed from the summits
and slopes of the two arches and the Flaming Gorge shale was laid bare,
and so soon as this occurred the conditions for lateral corrasion were
complete. With trachyte in the peaks and shale upon the slopes planation
would naturally result, and a drainage system would be arranged about
the dikes as a center without regard to the curves of the strata. The
subsequent removal of the shale would impart its drainage to the
underlying sandstones.
Either hypothesis is competent to explain the facts, but the data do not
warrant the adoption of one to the exclusion of the other. The waterways
of the Lesser arch may be either antecedent, or superimposed by
planation. The Greater arch may have been the first to rise or the last.
The drainage of Mount Hillers is consequent to the main uplift and to
the majority of the minor, but to the Pulpit arch it is inconsequent. In
this case there is no question that the arch has been truncated by
planation. (Figure 73.) The Hillers dome, rising five times as high as
the Pulpit, became the center of drainage for the cluster, and the
trachyte-laden streams which it sent forth were able to pare away
completely the lower arch while it was still unprotected by the hardness
of its nucleus. The foot-plain of Mount Hillers, which extends unbroken
to the outcrop of the Henry’s Fork conglomerate, is continued on several
lines across the Pulpit arch, although in the intervals the central area
is deeply excavated. The planation stage is just completed, and an epoch
of fixed waterways is inaugurated.
[Illustration:
FIG. 73.—Cross-section of the Pulpit Arch, showing its truncation.
]
The drainage of Mount Pennell is consequent in regard to the main
uplift, but inconsequent to some of the minor. A stream which rises on
the north flank not merely runs across one of the upper series of
laccolites,—a companion to the Sentinel,—but has cut into it and divided
it nearly to the base. It is probable that the position of the waterway
was fixed by planation, but no remnant of the plain was seen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account