Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
[In the diagram, a series of light and heavy beds are represented in
section by open and shaded spaces. A lava stream free to move upward or
laterally will intrude itself at some point (_c_) so placed that every
combination of superior beds (_a_), which includes the lowest, shall
have a less average density; and every combination of inferior strata
(_b_), which includes the highest, shall have a greater average density
than that of the lava.]
The first case is that of a volcano; the second is that of a laccolite;
and the third is the general case, including the others and applying to
all volcanoes and laccolites.
Conversely we may say that, given a series of strata of diverse and
alternating density, a very light lava will traverse it to the top and
be extruded; a heavier will intrude itself at some lower level; and a
series of dissimilar lavas may select an equal number of distinct
levels.
It is easy to imagine such a balancing of conditions that a slight
change in a lava will determine a great change in its level of
intrusion.
Having seen the general application of the hydrostatic law, it is time
to recall the condition which we laid aside at the start. Cohesion, or
rigidity, is never absent and must affect every phase of vulcanism. It
certainly opposes the free circulation of lavas, and it cannot but
modify their obedience to the hydrostatic law.
But granting this, and believing that a full comprehension of the
subject must include this condition, I am at a loss to tell in what way
it influences the selection by a lava flood of a subaërial or a
subterranean bourne. Whether it will on the whole oppose upward progress
more than lateral, or _vice versa_, is not clear. If it resists lateral
intrusion the more strongly, it favors the formation of volcanoes; if it
resists upward penetration the more strongly, it favors the formation of
laccolites; and in either case the working of the hydrostatic law is
modified.
But in neither case is the working of the law more than modified. The
law is not abrogated, and in obedience to it light lavas still _tend_ to
rise higher than heavy however much the rising of all lavas may be
hindered or favored.
In brief, since lavas are fluids they are subject to the law of fluid
equilibrium, and their behavior is conditioned by the relations of their
densities to the densities of the solids which they penetrate; and since
the latter solids are rigid and coherent, it is further conditioned by
the resistance which is opposed to their penetration. When the
resistance to penetration is the same in all directions, the relation of
densities determines the stopping place of the rising lava; but when the
vertical and lateral resistances are unequal, _their_ relation may be
the determining condition.
If we can decide whether the determinative condition in the Plateau
region was that of densities or that of penetrability, we shall have
solved our problem.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account