Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
_Table of Specific Gravities of Sedimentary Rocks of the Henry
Mountains._
──┬─────────────────────────────────┬────────────────┬─────────────────
│ Rock. │ Condition. │Specific gravity.
──┼─────────────────────────────────┼────────────────┼─────────────────
1│Masuk Sandstone │Unaltered │ 2.16
2│Blue Gate Sandstone │Unaltered │ 2.14
3│Blue Gate Shale │Unaltered │ 2.45
4│Flaming Gorge Shale │Unaltered │ 2.42
5│Gray Cliff Sandstone │Unaltered │ 2.13
6│Vermilion Cliff Sandstone, (top) │Unaltered (?) │ 2.21
7│Vermilion Cliff Sandstone, (base)│Unaltered (?) │ 2.28
8│Henry’s Fork Conglomerate │Slightly altered│ 2.25
9│Vermilion Cliff Sandstone, │Altered │ 2.48
10│Aubrey Sandstone │Altered │ 2.55
11│Tununk Shale │Altered │ 2.60
──┴─────────────────────────────────┴────────────────┴─────────────────
It is plain from this table that the effect of the metamorphism was to
increase the densities of the rocks affected. The Blue Gate shale which
_unaltered_ gave 2.45, is lithologically identical with the Tununk shale
which _altered_ gave 2.69. The Aubrey sandstone cannot be observed
unaltered in the vicinity of the mountains, but at a distance of forty
miles where it again comes to the surface it closely resembles the Gray
Cliff sandstone. If it has the same normal weight as the latter, then it
has increased from 2.13 to 2.55.
The specimens of the Vermilion Cliff sandstone numbered 6 and 7 were not
visibly changed, but as they were obtained from the flank of the Holmes
arch there was reason to suspect that their condition was not normal,
and the determined densities strengthen the suspicion. Judged by other
localities, the normal density of the Vermilion Cliff rock is not far
from that of the Gray Cliff rock, namely 2.13; and it is easy to believe
that the upper portion of the bed where it lay on the side of the Holmes
arch was changed in density to 2.21; while the lower portion lying
nearer the laccolite was changed to 2.28; and while the same bed among
the Ellsworth dikes acquired the density of 2.48.
Taking into account both these considerations and certain others which
need not be enumerated, I derive the following:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account