Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
They were not formed at any late stage of the final erosion, for they
conserve tables along their western base, which but for their shelter
would long since have disappeared. From the end of the Cretaceous period
to the end of the desiccation of the basin there is no event with which
the laccolites can be directly connected. There is however a
consideration which in an indirect way sanctions the opinion that the
epoch of igneous activity was after the deposition of the Tertiaries and
before their erosion.
The Masuk Sandstone is at once the summit of the Cretaceous and the
highest bed in the present Henry Mountain section. If it were restored
over the entire range, the laccolites of the upper zone would have on
the average thirty-five hundred feet of cover, and those of the lower
zone nearly seven thousand feet. This was the depth of their original
cover, if they were intruded at the close of the Cretaceous age. During
the epoch of Tertiary deposition and the subsequent epoch of erosion,
the cover first increased in depth and then diminished, having its
maximum at the end of the Tertiary deposition. If it can be shown that
the original cover of the upper laccolites exceeded thirty-five hundred
feet, the question of age will be reduced to comparatively narrow
limits. In order to discuss the problem of the original depth of cover
it will be necessary to consider another matter, of which the connection
will not at first be apparent.
_The size of laccolites._—It is a matter worthy of note that no
laccolite of inconsiderable extent is known in the Henry Mountains. The
smallest which has been measured is more than half a mile in diameter,
and the largest about four miles. The phenomenon does not occur upon a
small scale, but has a definite inferior limit to its magnitude. Let us
seek an explanation of this limit.
The dome of strata which covers a laccolite has for its profile on every
side a monoclinal curve. In Figure 52 the section of a dome exhibits a
monoclinal flexure in _s a_ and again in _s b_; and the dome being
approximately circular this flexure completely surrounds it. We may even
describe or define the dome as a monoclinal flexure encircling a point
or a space. Considering now that when the laccolite was injected the
overlying strata were lifted, and that this disturbance was communicated
upward to the then existing surface of the earth, we may properly speak
of the lifted body of rock as a cylinder bounded on every side by a
monoclinal flexure. Furthermore, since the monoclinal flexure is the
structural equivalent of the fault[4], we may render our conception
still simpler by replacing in imagination the encircling flexure by an
encircling fault, and picturing to ourselves the uplifted rock mass as a
simple cylinder, perfectly divided from the surrounding rock and slidden
upward so as to project above the surface an amount equal to the depth
of the laccolite.
Footnote 4:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account