Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
183. _Ascent of the Nassellaria from the Plectoidea._--The monophyletic
hypothesis (No. 2, p. 893) which regards the basal tripod as the common
origin of the skeleton of all NASSELLARIA, starts from the simplest forms
of the #Plectoidea# (_Triplagia_, _Plagoniscus_, _Triplecta_,
_Plectaniscus_, &c., Pl. 91). All #Plectoidea# may be immediately derived
as diverging twigs of these, as well as all triradial and multiradial forms
of #Cyrtoidea# and #Spyroidea#; for in all these cases the distinctive
triradial (or the derived multiradial) form of skeleton appears directly
derivable from the simple basal tripod of the former. The same is perhaps
also true of many #Botryodea#. {cxix}Furthermore, certain important forms
of #Stephoidea# (_Cortina_, _Cortiniscus_, _Stephanium_, _Stephaniscus_,
&c.), which have a characteristic combination of the sagittal ring and
basal tripod, may be immediately derived from such forms of #Plectoidea# as
_Plagoniscus cortinaris_, _Plagiocarpa procortina_, _Plectaniscus
cortiniscus_, &c. On the contrary, those #Stephoidea# and #Cyrtoidea# in
which the basal tripod is wanting can only be derived from the #Plectoidea#
by the assumption that this structure has disappeared in consequence of
phylogenetic degeneration. The monophyletic derivation of the NASSELLARIA
from the #Plectoidea# has more internal probability than that from the
#Stephoidea#, since it is easier to suppose that the Cortinida (_Cortina_,
_Stephanium_, &c.) have been derived from the #Plectoidea# (_Plagoniscus_,
_Plagiocarpa_) than the converse. This view is the basis of the
hypothetical tree shown in § 180.
184. _Ascent of the Nassellaria from the Stephoidea._--The monophyletic
hypothesis (No. 1, p. 893) which regards the primary sagittal ring as the
common starting point of the skeleton in all NASSELLARIA, starts from the
simplest forms of #Stephoidea# (_Archicircus_, _Lithocircus_, &c., Pl. 81).
All #Stephoidea# and #Spyroidea# may be immediately derived from these, as
also the majority of the #Cyrtoidea# and probably of the #Botryodea#. Those
numerous forms of the last two groups, however, which possess no trace of a
sagittal ring, can only be derived from the former by the supposition that
the latter has completely disappeared in in consequence of gradual
phylogenetic degeneration. The same holds true also of the #Plectoidea#,
although certain forms (_e.g._, _Plagiocarpa procortina_, Pl. 91, fig. 5;
_Plectaniscus cortiniscus_, Pl. 91, fig. 9) appear to indicate the
commencing formation of the sagittal ring by the concrescence of two
branches, which approach each other from the upper part of the apical rod
and the ventral part of the basal rod. In any case, it is a fact of great
phylogenetic significance, that the primary sagittal ring in the cephalis
of the #Cyrtoidea# shows all conceivable stages of degeneration (compare
Bütschli, L. N. 40, 41, as well as the general account of and critical
comparison of the NASSELLARIA, pp. 889-895, &c.).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account