Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, First Part: Porulosa (Spumellaria and Acantharia): Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
189. _Genealogical Tree of the Botryodea._--The peculiar order #Botryodea#
(p. 1103), which is both difficult to investigate and insufficiently known,
presents great phylogenetic difficulties both as to its ascent and descent.
Probably the different genera of this order have been polyphyletically
developed from different groups of #Cyrtoidea# (perhaps also to some extent
of #Spyroidea#) by the formation of lobes in the cephalis. The three
families of #Botryodea# are related to each other in the same way as are
the three first families of the #Cyrtoidea#. From the single-jointed
Cannobotryida (corresponding to the Monocyrtida), the two-jointed
Lithobotryida (corresponding to the Dicyrtida), may be derived by the
development of a basal thorax, and from the latter the three-jointed
Pylobotryida (like the Tricyrtida) by the addition of an abdomen. In the
last two families the forms with an open basal mouth {cxxii}(Botryopylida
and Botryocyrtida) are to be regarded as primitive: the Botryocellida and
Botryocampida have arisen by the closure of this mouth with a basal
lattice-plate.
190. _Genealogical Tree of the Cyrtoidea._--The multiform and extensive
group #Cyrtoidea# presents the greatest difficulties to be found in the
phylogeny of the NASSELLARIA, because their morphological relations are
most complicated, and because similar forms very often appear to be of
quite different origin. The great majority of the #Cyrtoidea# show more or
less clearly a combination of the three structural elements: sagittal ring,
basal tripod, and latticed cephalis (p. 891). There are also, however,
numerous #Cyrtoidea#, whose skeleton no longer shows any trace of the
sagittal ring. Many of these show as the basis of the skeleton a strong
basal tripod with an apical spine, around which the cephalis has obviously
been secondarily developed, _e.g._, the remarkable Euscenida (p. 1146, Pls.
53, 97) and the interesting Callimitrida (p. 1217, Pls. 63, 64). These may
have been derived immediately from the #Plectoidea# without any relation to
the #Stephoidea#. There are also numerous true Monocyrtida, whose shell
consists of a simple latticed cephalis without a trace of the sagittal ring
or basal tripod (Cyrtocalpida, Pl. 51, figs. 9-13; Pl. 98, fig. 13); these
may have been developed directly from the skeletonless Nassellida by the
formation of a simple ovoid _Gromia_-like shell, and may have no relation
either to the #Stephoidea# or #Plectoidea#. On these grounds, as well as
from the complicated relationships of the many smaller groups of
#Cyrtoidea#, it is probable that the whole order has been developed
polyphyletically from different divisions of the #Plectellaria#.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account