Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State For the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry Into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; With AppendicesChadwick, Edwin
History
Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State For the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry Into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; With Appendices
Chadwick, Edwin
Housing -- Great Britain; Public health -- Great Britain
“A man had to fetch water from one of the public pumps in Bath, the
distance from his house being about a quarter of a mile,—‘It is as
valuable,’ he said, ‘as strong beer. We can’t use it for cooking, or
anything of that sort, but only for drinking and tea.’ ‘Then where do
you get water for cooking and washing?’—‘Why, from the river. But it
is muddy, and often stinks bad, because all the filth is carried
there.’ ‘Do you then prefer to cook your victuals in water which is
muddy and stinks to walking a quarter of a mile to fetch it from the
pump?’—‘We can’t help ourselves, you know. We could not go all that
way for it.’ There are many gentlemen’s houses in the same district in
which the water is not fit for cooking; and I know that much privation
and inconvenience is undergone to avoid the expense of water-carriage.
I have often wondered to see the shifts which have been endured rather
than be at the cost of an extra pail of water, of which the price was
three halfpence. With the poor, far less obstacles are an absolute
barrier, because no privation is felt by them so little as that of
cleanliness. The propensity to dirt is so strong, the steps so few and
easy, that nothing but the utmost facilities for water can act as a
counterpoise; and such is the love of uncleanliness, when once
contracted, that no habit, not even drunkenness, is so difficult to
eradicate.”
In most towns, and certainly in the larger manufacturing towns, those
members of a family who are of strength to fetch water are usually of
strength to be employed in profitable industry, and the mere value of
their time expended in the labour of fetching water, is almost always
much higher than the cost of regular supplies of water even at the
charge made by the water companies. In Glasgow the charge for supplying
a labourer’s tenement is 5_s._ per annum; in Manchester 6s. In London
the usual charge is 10_s._ for a tenement containing two families, for
which sum two tons and a half of water per week may be obtained if
needed. For 5_s._ per annum, then, as a water-rate (on which from 10 to
20 per cent. is paid to the owner for collection), each labourer’s
family may be supplied in the metropolis with one ton and a quarter of
water weekly, if they find it necessary to use so much. The ton is 216
gallons, equal to 108 pails full, at two gallons the pail. Thus for less
than one penny farthing, 135 pails full of water are taken into the
house without the labour of fetching, without spilling or disturbance,
and placed in constant readiness for use. Under any circumstances, if
the labourer or his wife or child would otherwise be employed, even in
the lowest-paid labour or in knitting stockings, the cost of fetching
water by hand is extravagantly high as compared with the highest cost of
water lifted by steam and conducted through iron pipes at a large
expenditure of capital (the lowest in London is about 200,000_l._) and
by an expensive management.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account