Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State For the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry Into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; With AppendicesChadwick, Edwin
History
Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State For the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry Into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; With Appendices
Chadwick, Edwin
Housing -- Great Britain; Public health -- Great Britain
“Paris possesses an immense mass of water, which can be distributed
into every quarter and every house. Does the demand multiply with the
pipes? Assuredly not, and one might well be surprised to see the
negligence and apathy of proprietors in this respect. Some persons
adduce the fact to prove that seven litres[12] of water are sufficient
for the inhabitants of Paris, whilst sixty are necessary for London,
and still more for Edinburgh. But if we look closer to the conduct of
the proprietors, we shall find that it proceeds from calculations well
understood. It is the certainty that they will have sooner to empty
the cesspools which scares them. This operation, and the expense it
often brings with it, influences the venal propensities of the
proprietors. Is it likely that they will pay for water of which the
inevitable result will be to multiply the number of operations they
dread the most, and which increase the expense in an enormous
proportion? Thus the actual state of our cesspools, and the mode of
emptying them now in use, are, in our opinion, the principal causes
which prevent individuals from taking the water, and which retard the
period in which the city will receive the interest of the enormous
sums that it has devoted, and still devotes daily, to the supply of
water.”
It is to be hoped, however, that the legislature will give the powers
and direct the means requisite in this country, to furnish to every city
in Europe a practical demonstration that by the art of the engineer, the
obstacle to improvement, formed by the great expense and annoyance of
removing the refuse of houses and streets may be rendered
inconsiderable. In Paris the interests of turbulent bodies of men, the
water-carriers, and another class of men called the chiffonniers, who
live by raking for what they can find amongst the refuse cast into the
streets, are opposed to any change which will reduce the charge of
imperfect cleansing, and the disease promoted by filth. The general
practice in that metropolis is to cast all the rubbish of the house into
the street on the overnight, or before seven o’clock in the morning,
when men attend with carts to sweep it up and remove it. In the
nighttime, however, the chiffonnier comes with a lantern and rakes
amongst the refuse, and picks from it bones, rags, or whatever may have
been thrown away by accident, or the carelessness of the servants. The
offensive filth of their persons and their occupation, makes them
outcasts from other classes of workmen; they sleep amidst their
collections of refuse, and they are idle during the day; they are like
all men who live under such circumstances, prone to indulgence in ardent
spirits; being degraded and savage, they are ready to throw away their
wretched lives on every occasion. There are nearly 2000 of the
chiffonniers alone in Paris, and they and the water-carriers were
conspicuous actors in the revolution of 1830. During the administration
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account