Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State For the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry Into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; With AppendicesChadwick, Edwin
History
Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State For the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry Into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; With Appendices
Chadwick, Edwin
Housing -- Great Britain; Public health -- Great Britain
“You are aware that these two towns of nearly equal population are
nearly alike as to natural advantages of situation, &c., except that
Bungay, having a larger proportion of rural population inhabiting the
district called Bungay Uplands, ought to be more healthy than Beccles,
which has nearly its whole population confined to the town. About 30
years since, Beccles began a system of drainage, which it has
continued to improve, till at the present time every part of the town
is well drained, and I am not aware of a single open drain in the
place. Bungay, on the contrary, with equally convenient opportunities
for drainage, has neglected its advantages in that respect, has one or
two large reservoirs for filth in the town itself, and some of its
principal drains are open ones. The result you will see is, that
Bungay, with a smaller proportion of town inhabitants, has become of
late years less healthy than Beccles. I have carefully taken the
number of burials from the parish registers of each town for the last
30 years, and dividing them into decennial periods, I have calculated
the proportion which the deaths bore to the mean population, between
one census and the other, during each 10 years; the only possible
source of fallacy is the want of the census for 1841; but in its
absence I have supposed the same rate of increase as took place
between that of 1821 and that of 1831 for each place. Sinking
fractions, the following has been the proportion of deaths to the
population in the two towns:—
Beccles. Bungay.
Between the years 1811 and 1821 1 in 67 1 in 69
Between the years 1821 and 1831 1 in 72 1 in 67
Between the years 1831 and 1841 1 in 71 1 in 59
You will therefore see that the rate of mortality has gradually
diminished in Beccles since it has been drained, whilst in Bungay,
notwithstanding its larger proportion of rural population, it has
considerably increased.
“The Ditchingham Factory may have given a greater increase of
population to Bungay than I have allowed for, but, on the other hand,
the Roman Catholics and the Independents bury many of their dead in
their own ground, which I have not calculated upon. Since writing the
above, I have been over to Bungay, to examine more particularly the
state of its drainage, which is much worse than I had any idea of. If
their population should much increase, their mortality will increase
much faster.”
A frightful picture of a considerable proportion of the labouring
population of Leeds in respect to sewerage and drainage is afforded by
the report of _Mr. Baker_, who gives the following instance of
amendment:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account