Representative British Orations Volume 1 (of 4): With Introductions and Explanatory Notes
History
Representative British Orations Volume 1 (of 4): With Introductions and Explanatory Notes
Speeches, addresses, etc., English
This competence in the colony assemblies is certain. It is proved by
the whole tenor of their acts of supply in all the assemblies, in
which the constant style of granting is, “an aid to his Majesty”; and
acts granting to the Crown have regularly for near a century passed
the public offices without dispute. Those who have been pleased
paradoxically to deny this right, holding that none but the British
Parliament can grant to the Crown, are wished to look to what is done,
not only in the colonies, but in Ireland, in one uniform, unbroken
tenor every session.[70]
Sir, I am surprised that this doctrine should come from some of the law
servants of the Crown. I say that if the Crown could be responsible,
his Majesty—but certainly the ministers, and even these law officers
themselves, through whose hands the acts pass biennially in Ireland,
or annually the colonies, are in a habitual course of committing
impeachable offences. What habitual offenders have been all presidents
of the council, all secretaries of state, all first lords of trade,
all attorneys, and all solicitors-general! However, they are safe, as
no one impeaches them; and there is no ground of charge against them,
except in their own unfounded theories.
The fifth resolution is also a resolution of fact:
“That the said General Assemblies, General Courts, or other
bodies legally qualified as aforesaid, have at sundry times
freely granted several large subsidies and public aids for
his Majesty’s service, according to their abilities, when
required thereto by letter from one of his Majesty’s principal
secretaries of State. And that their right to grant the same,
and their cheerfulness and sufficiency in the said grants, have
been at sundry times acknowledged by Parliament.”
To say nothing of their great expenses in the Indian wars; and not to
take their exertion in foreign ones, so high as the supplies in the
year 1695, not to go back to their public contributions in the year
1710, I shall begin to travel only where the journals give me light;
resolving to deal in nothing but fact authenticated by parliamentary
record, and to build myself wholly on that solid basis.
On the 4th of April, 1748, a committee of this House came to the
following resolution:
“_Resolved_, That it is the opinion of this committee, _that it
is just and reasonable_ that the several provinces and colonies
of Massachusetts Bay, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode
Island, be reimbursed the expenses they have been at in taking
and securing to the Crown of Great Britain the Island of Cape
Breton and its dependencies.”
These expenses were immense for such colonies. They were above £200,000
sterling; money first raised and advanced on their public credit.
On the 28th of January, 1756, a message from the King came to us to
this effect:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account