Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent ResearchMarkham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
History
Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent Research
Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard III, King of England, 1452-1485
[23] It is said by the Croyland monk (572) that there was an eclipse of
the sun on the day of her death. This would make it March 16. Some
authorities have the 11th.
[24] Buck, p. 129. 'Non cum minore honore quam sicut reginam decuit
sepeliri.'--Croyland, i. 572.
[25] Croyland, _York Records_, pp. 208, 210.
[26] _Rot. Parl._ vi. 227.
[27] John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, the third son of Edward III.,
who lived to marry, had for his first wife Blanche, heiress of Henry
Duke of Lancaster, through whom he acquired the title. By her he had
Henry IV., who usurped the crown, Edward and John, who died young,
Philippa, married to Joam I., King of Portugal, and Elizabeth Duchess
of Exeter. He married secondly Constanza, heiress of Pedro King of
Castille and Leon, and had a daughter Catalina, wife of Enrique III.,
King of Castille and Leon. A governess was engaged for the daughters
of the Duke of Lancaster. This was Catharine, daughter of a herald of
Hainault, named Payn Roet, who had married Sir Hugh Swynford in 1367.
The Duke had four children by this woman, named John, Henry, Thomas,
and Joan, surnamed Beaufort from the castle in France where they were
born. All were born during the lifetime not only of the Duke's wife,
but also of the governess's husband. The Duchess died in 1394, and the
realm was scandalised by the marriage of the Duke of Lancaster with
this woman on January 13, 1396. The Duke died in February 1399,
Catharine Swynford on May 10, 1403. Their children were granted
letters of legitimation by Richard II. in February 1397, confirmed by
Henry IV. on February 10, 1407, 'excepta dignitate regali.' Henry
Tudor's mother was granddaughter of John, the eldest of the Beauforts.
[28] Every act of Richard III. has been persistently misrepresented.
This loan is usually alleged to have been a return to the illegal
system of 'benevolences,' which Richard had himself abolished a year
before, by Act of Parliament. Even Miss Halsted is led into this
error. But Mr. Gairdner has completely disposed of the accusation.
See Croyland, p. 572, and Lingard's remarks, iv. 255. Gairdner, p. 198.
{148}
CHAPTER XI
THE BATTLE OF BOSWORTH
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account