Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent ResearchMarkham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
History
Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent Research
Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard III, King of England, 1452-1485
The Tudor fables are now discredited and are dying, but they are dying
hard.
[1] Richard II. was the first of our Kings, after the Norman Conquest,
who was partly an Englishman. Henry V., Edward IV., and Richard III.
were almost pure Englishmen. So was Edward VI., and Elizabeth was a
thorough Englishwoman. Mary II. and Anne were half English.
[2] See p. 159, note 1.
[3] 'Dr. Morton had taken his revenge and written a book in Latin
against King Richard, which came afterwards to the hands of Mr. More.
The book was lately in the hands of Mr. Roper of Eltham, as Sir Edward
Hoby, who saw it, told me.'--Buck, p. 75.
[4] 'Written as I have heard by Morton.'--Harington's _Metamorphosis of
Ajax_, p. 46. Mr. Gairdner has suggested that the book attributed to
More is a translation of one written in Latin by Morton. See _Letters
and Papers illustrative of the Reign of Richard III._, &c. Preface
xviii. (_n_). It is really the English version that was dictated or
inspired by Morton.
[5] More's _Utopia_, p. 20.
[6] See for instance Sharon Turner (iii. 462), who claims unquestioning
belief in this scurrilous production, because 'all confess More's
ability and integrity.' See also Jesse (p. 156 _n._ and p. 500).
In the same spirit Sir John Harington defended his own filthy treatise
because 'the worthy and incorrupt Master More' was dirty in his History
of Richard III. These writers seem to think that falsehood becomes
truth, and obscenity becomes decency in this book, merely because its
authorship is attributed to More. See _Metamorphosis of Ajax_, p. 46.
[7] 'As I myself, who wrote this pamphlet, truly know.' This is not in
Rastell's version; but in the continuation of Hardyng's Chronicle.
[8] Speaking of Polydore Virgil in his _Life of Henry VIII._ (p. 9),
Lord Herbert of Cherbury adds: 'in whom I have observed not a little
malignity.' The story of Cardinal Wolsey's ingratitude to Fox owes its
parentage to the spite of Polydore Virgil; whom Wolsey imprisoned. It
was quite untrue.--Brewer.
[9] 'Polydore Virgil committed as many of our ancient manuscript
volumes to the flames as would have filled a waggon, that the faults of
his own work might pass undiscovered.'--Caius, _De Antiquitate
Cantabrigiæ_ (1574), p. 52.
'Polydore caused all the histories to be burnt which by the King's
authority and the assistance of his friends he could possibly come
at.'--La Poplinière, _Histoire des Histoires_, ix. 485.
[10] The Act of Parliament explaining the title of Richard III. to the
crown.
[11] Mr. Campbell's Introduction to the _Materials for the History of
the Reign of Henry VII_.
[12] Rous was one of the Chantry Priests at Guy's Cliff. He died in
1491, and was buried at St. Mary's, Warwick.
[13] One proof of this is that he calls Lord Stanley the Earl of Derby.
He was created Earl of Derby by Henry VII.
[14] _Rerum Anglicarum scriptorum veterum_. Tom. i. (Oxoniæ, 1684.)
[15] _Alia Hist. Croylandensis continuatio_, pp. 549-578.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account