Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent ResearchMarkham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
History
Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent Research
Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard III, King of England, 1452-1485
Rous, Polydore Virgil, and Morton are the authorities for the unequal
shoulders. Rous says that the right shoulder was higher. Morton makes
the left shoulder much higher. Their contradictory testimony shows the
worthless character of both these authorities. Polydore Virgil merely
mentions an inequality. Fabyan and the Croyland monk do not say a word
against Richard's personal appearance. A curious piece of evidence was
discovered by Mr. Davies of York, which bears on the question.[9] From
the 'York Records' it appears that, six years after King Richard's
death, a man named Burton was brought before the Lord Mayor accused of
calling that prince, whose memory was so beloved in the north, 'a
crouchback.' One John Poynter, who heard this remark, told Burton that
he lied, and struck at him with a little rod he had in his hand. It
would seem, therefore, that if there was any defect in Richard's
figure, it was so slight that its very existence was matter of dispute
among those who could well remember the King, while it was
imperceptible to Stow's informants. On the whole, we may accept the
conclusion of Miss Halsted that Richard was of slight and delicate
build, and that the severe martial exercises in which his youth had
been spent had caused the shoulder of his sword-arm to be very slightly
higher than the other.
The story of the withered arm comes from Morton. That astute prelate
always had an object in making his statements. This particular tale
was invented to draw off attention from the real charge made by the
Protector against the Woodvilles. It served its turn, and may be
dismissed as false without any hesitation. {187} For it is not
mentioned by a single other authority. The victor of Barnet and
Tewkesbury, the leader of the brilliant charge at Bosworth, who
unhorsed Sir John Cheney[10] and William Brandon, must have had
serviceable arms.
The object of the Tudor historians in commencing their grotesque
caricature of an imaginary monster with these stories of his personal
deformity is transparent. They intended to make him detestable from
the outset. They calculated that improbable crimes would be more
readily believed if the alleged perpetrator was a deformed hunchback
born with teeth. They were right. Nothing has more conduced to an
unreasoning prejudice against Richard, and to a firm belief in his
alleged crimes, than the impression of his personal repulsiveness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account