Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent ResearchMarkham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
History
Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent Research
Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard III, King of England, 1452-1485
[10] _Journal des Etats-Généraux de France tenus en_ 1483-84 (Documents
Inédits), quoted by Gairdner in his _Richard III._ p. 160.
[11] He accepted a present of horses from Louis as a matter of courtesy.
[12] Rymer's _Foedera_, xii. p. 234.
[13] 'Nepotes clam ferro feriri jussit.'--André.
[14] 'Ita quod ex post paucissimis notum fuit qua morte martirizati
sunt.'--Rous.
{246}
CHAPTER V
HENRY TUDOR IN THE DOCK
Murder of the Princes in the Tower. Conviction.
[Sidenote: Victims after Bosworth]
Henry Tydder, _alias_ Tudor, must now take his place in the dock. Let
us first see what manner of man this fortunate adventurer was. In 1485
he was twenty-eight years of age. He is described as a man of slender
build, about five feet nine inches high, with a saturnine expression,
grey restless eyes, yellow hair, and very little of it. Having passed
his life as a fugitive and conspirator, cunning and dissimulation had
become a second nature to him. The victory gained for him at Bosworth,
by the foulest treachery, placed despotic power in his hands. His
first acts were the illegal and unjust executions of William
Catesby,[1] Chancellor of the Exchequer, of John Buck, the Comptroller
of the late King's Household, of {247} William Bracher, Yeoman of the
Crown, and of his son. These executions were in violation of all law.
They were simply murders; for Henry Tudor himself had no legal status,
and was in fact an attainted outlaw. Catesby was the faithful and
loyal minister of a King who studied the welfare of his subjects, and
was the Speaker of the best Parliament that had sat since the time of
Edward I. He was an able and diligent public servant. This was his
only crime. Nothing tangible has ever been alleged against him, except
that he did his duty by reporting the meditated treason of Hastings.
If the fables of Morton and his colleagues are accepted, the executions
of Rivers, Grey and Vaughan were doubtful acts. But the executions of
Catesby, Buck, and the Brachers were heinous crimes. Richard was the
Chief of the State, though it may be held that his measures were
unjust. Henry was an outlaw without legal authority of any kind, and
his executions were ruthless murders. Thus did this adventurer wade
through the blood of innocent men to his usurped throne.[2] His next
proceeding was to {248} send Sir Robert Willoughby to Sheriff Hutton,
to get possession of young Edward Earl of Warwick, the heir to the
throne, and of the late King's niece Elizabeth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account