Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent ResearchMarkham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
History
Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent Research
Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard III, King of England, 1452-1485
brink for a long time before he summoned up {250} courage to act. Even
then he much preferred the forms of law, thinking that if he shared the
deed with others, the guilt became a limited liability.
Henry had the wisdom to see that, although his claim of conquest and
vague assertion of right by descent[5] might serve for a time, he must
establish some better title to secure any stability for his throne. He
had obtained his position by the favour of a treacherous faction, and
was confirmed in it by a pretended Parliament of his adherents, many of
them still under attainder. Unlike the grand ceremony of King
Richard's coronation, when the whole peerage was present, that of Henry
was very thinly attended. He felt that some step must promptly be
taken, with a view to strengthening his position, and reconciling the
nation to his usurpation.
There was Elizabeth, the late King's niece, whose person he had
secured. If she was made queen it might propitiate the powerful
Yorkist party. But she was illegitimate, and consequently young
Warwick was the rightful King. There was another more fatal
difficulty, a knowledge of which was shared with the girl's mother, if
not with the girl herself. All evidence of the illegitimacy might be
destroyed. Henry caused the Act of Parliament recording and legalising
King Richard's title to be expunged. He ordered the original Act to be
removed from the Rolls and burnt. Every person who possessed a copy or
remembrance of it, was commanded to deliver up the same, under a
penalty of fine and imprisonment at the tyrant's pleasure.[6] Henry
granted a general pardon to Bishop {251} Stillington in order to avoid
prosecuting him for the offence of having borne witness to the
illegitimacy. For he feared discussion. He then trumped up some other
charge, threw the Bishop into prison, and that unfortunate prelate
never came out alive.
But this was not enough. There was other work to be done from which
Henry long recoiled. Yet without its perpetration he could not safely
be married to Elizabeth, and there could be no security for his
usurpation. Indeed, his position would be rendered even more
precarious by the destruction of the evidence of illegitimacy. He had
usurped a throne to retain which he saw that the committal of more than
one crime was indispensable.
Meanwhile Henry had summoned the so-called Parliament of his outlawed
adherents. He got his own attainder reversed. He then caused an act
of attainder to be passed against the late King and many loyal noblemen
and knights, whose property he seized. He had the effrontery to accuse
them of treason to him, by dating the commencement of his reign from
the day previous to the battle of Bosworth. No more shameless act of
injustice is recorded in the annals of tyranny. The bit of legal
chicanery by which an attempt was made to excuse it, shows the
character of the man.
======================================================================
{252}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account