Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent ResearchMarkham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
History
Richard III: His Life & Character, Reviewed in the Light of Recent Research
Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard III, King of England, 1452-1485
We now come to the main stronghold of Tudor calumny--the story of the
smothering of the little princes in the Tower. Mr. Gairdner makes a
hesitating defence. He cannot doubt that the dreadful deed was done.
But he admits that the story, as told in the narrative attributed to
Sir Thomas More, is full of inaccuracies and improbabilities. He
contends, however, that it is not necessary for it to be true in all
its details, in order to give credence to the main allegation. He also
admits that the crime imputed to Richard rests upon the assertions of
only a few, and that two of these mention it merely as a report. He
denies that Richard was the cold scheming calculating villain of
previous histories; and apparently thinks that, if this had been his
character, he would not have acted in the way alleged in the story.
Consequently the story could not be true. For a cold calculating
villain would not have been so foolish as to leave London, and then
send his orders to the Tower, without having previously ascertained
that they would be obeyed. Mr. Gairdner's theory is that Richard was
headstrong and reckless as to consequences, a man of violent and
impatient temper. Such a man, Mr. Gairdner thinks, might act in the
way described in the story; {299} if a strong motive was suddenly
supplied to him. Mr. Gairdner looks round for such a motive, and
thinks he has found it in the alleged contemplated rising in favour of
the two young princes. But no such motive existed. The date given for
the alleged murders was August 1483. The rising, even if it had been
in favour of the boys and not of Buckingham, was in October. Mr.
Davies has shown that the first tidings reached the king at Lincoln on
October 11,[24] and Mr. Gairdner fully admits that Richard was taken
completely by surprise. This proves that no motive for the crime was
supplied in August, calculated to make a violent and reckless man take
sudden action. If there was no motive there was no murder. Thus Mr.
Gairdner's explanation fails, while the improbabilities remain as
strong as ever. The difficulties disappear as soon as Richard is
acquitted, and his astute successor is placed in the dock.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account