Great Britain -- History -- Richard I, 1189-1199; Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard I, King of England, 1157-1199
In less than six months the German envoys returned from England,
bringing with them “the greater part” of the ransom—seemingly the
stipulated hundred thousand marks, for the Emperor wrote on December
20 to the English prelates, barons, and people, and Richard on
December 22 to the new archbishop of Canterbury, Hubert Walter,
announcing that the captive’s liberation was to take place on
Monday, January 17; adding that on the following Sunday (January
23, 1194) he was to receive the crown of the kingdom of Provence
which the Emperor had granted to him.[1111] Richard’s place of
confinement at this time was probably Spire. There, on the appointed
day, Henry held [Sidenote: 1194 _Jan. 17_] a council which “after
long discussion” was adjourned to [Sidenote: _Feb. 2_] re-assemble
at Mentz on Candlemas Day.[1112] At this adjourned meeting Richard
was present, with his mother, Archbishop Walter of Rouen, and the
bishops of Ely and Bath, who had all come to witness his release. To
the amazement of all parties, Henry proposed a yet further delay,
and shamelessly avowed his motive for the proposal. He had received
in a private audience at Spire, in January, some messengers charged
with letters from Philip and John. He now brought these messengers
before the council, and handed the letters to Richard. In them the
Lion-Heart’s overlord and his brother made to the Emperor three
alternative offers. He should receive from Philip fifty thousand
marks and from John thirty thousand if he would keep Richard prisoner
till Michaelmas; or a thousand pounds of silver (seemingly from
the two jointly) every month, so long as he chose to keep him; or
a hundred thousand marks from Philip and fifty thousand marks from
John if he would either keep him another twelvemonth or deliver him
up to them. Richard, in utter desperation, appealed to the prelates
and princes who had stood surety for the Emperor’s fulfilment of
the treaty drawn up at Worms.[1113] Two of them—the archbishops of
Mentz and Cologne—protested strongly against a breach of so solemn an
agreement; the other members of the council seem to have taken the
same side; and after a [Sidenote: _Feb. 4_] two days’ struggle Henry
yielded.[1114]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account