[369] Rigord, 97. [370] Date from _Gesta_, 73, 74; place from R. Howden, iii. 4. [371] _Gesta_, 74. [372] _Ib._; R. Howden, iii. 4; Gerv. Cant., i. 450, 451 (who seems to have got confused between Auvergne and Berry); and Rigord, 97, whose statement is of course conclusive as to the final terms so far as the lands are concerned. [373] Gerv. Cant., i. 451. [374] _Ib._, 450. [375] _Ib._, 457; _Gesta_, 75, with a self-contradictory date. [376] Gerv. Cant., _l.c._, says Southampton; the _Gesta_, _l.c._, say Portsmouth. [377] Gerv. Cant., i. 453, 454, 457; R. Diceto, ii. 67; cf. _Gesta_, 76. The first gives date August 14, the second August 15. [378] _Gesta_, 75. [379] _Gesta_, 74, 75. [380] W. Newb., lib. iv. c. 1. [381] _Gesta_, 75-6. [382] Gerv. Cant., i. 457. [383] The _Itin. Ric. Reg._, 142, says “die S. Ægidii receptus est cum processione apud Westmonasterium, et die tertia sequenti ... unctus est in regem.” Gervase, i. 457, dates the arrival in London September 2. The _Hist. G. le Mar._, ll. 9568-9, says, “A mult riche procession Fu receuz dedenz Seint Pol,” without any date. [384] _Itin._, 142; Gerv. Cant., i. 457; R. Diceto, ii. 68; _Gesta_, 78, 79. [385] Ralph de Diceto, who as dean of S. Paul’s handed the ampulla to the Primate, the bishop of London, to whom this duty belonged, being absent through illness. R. Diceto, ii. 69. [386] Cf. R. Diceto, ii. 68, _Gesta_, 81, 82, and R. Howden, iii. 10. [387] _Gesta_, 82; R. Howden, iii. 10, 11. [388] _Estoire de la Croisade_, ll. 205, 206; the writer implies that he was there. [389] _Gesta_, 83. [390] _Gesta_, 83; cf. W. Newb., lib. iv. c. 1. [391] W. Newb., _l.c._ [392] _Ib._ [393] _Gesta_, 84. [394] W. Newb., _l.c._ [395] _Gesta_, 84. [396] So at least we should gather from the treasurer’s apparent inability to find any money for King Henry’s funeral; _Hist. G. le Mar._, ll. 9173-200. Of course we must remember that Richard himself had emptied that treasury two years before. This again implies that he was at that time short of money in Aquitaine, and therefore not likely to have since then accumulated anything in the way of a reserve fund there. [397] _Gesta_, 76, 77; R. Howden, iii. 8. [398] “Nongenta millia librarum,” _Gesta_, 77; “Thesaurus ... magnus valde, excedens numerum et valentiam centum millia marcarum” (= £66,666 13_s._ 4_d._), R. Howden, _l.c._ There can be little doubt that the _Gesta’s_ figure is, as Dr. Stubbs suggested it might be, an error for “nonaginta.” We know that the royal revenue for the financial year which ended three weeks after Richard’s coronation amounted to somewhat less than fifty thousand pounds (£48,781; Stubbs, preface to _Gesta_, ii. xcix). [399] R. Howden, iii. 17. [400] _Gesta_, 90. [401] W. Newb., lib. iv. c. 5. [402] R. Devizes (ed. Stevenson), 10. [403] _Gesta_, 90, 91. [404] R. Howden, iii. 13. [405] W. Newb., lib. iv. c. 5; cf. R. Devizes, 10. [406] R. Howden, ii. 302. [407] R. Devizes, 7.