Great Britain -- History -- Richard I, 1189-1199; Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Richard I, King of England, 1157-1199
[814] _Itin._, 289.
[815] _Est._, ll. 7207-32; _Itin._, 290.
[816] “Car si a vos mescheiet E qui issi fust escheiet, Cristente
sereit tuee,” _Est._, ll. 7341-3.
[817] _Est._, ll. 7233-66; _Itin._, 291-4.
[818] Bohadin, 284, 285.
[819] _Ib._, 286.
[820] _Ib._
[821] _Itin._, 296.
[822] Bohadin, _l.c._; cf. Ibn Alathyr, 53.
[823] Ibn Alathyr, _l.c._
[824] Bohadin, 286, 287.
[825] In the French edition of Bohadin the date is given as “le 11
Chouwal,” _i. e._ November 1. But evidently this is impossible; it
must mean 21 Shawal = November 11.
[826] Bohadin, 287-91. The accounts of these negotiations given
in _Est._, ll. 7370-428, and _Itin._, 295-7, are obviously less
trustworthy.
[827] Bohadin, 292, says he went to Tell el Jezer, _i. e._ “the Hill
of the Bridge,” Stubbs, note 1 to _Itin._, 298; possibly a bridge
over the little river that runs through the Wady Ali, between Natroun
and Amwas. The Frank chroniclers say he went “dreit al Toron as
Chevalers,” _i. e._ Natroun, _Est._, ll. 7456-62; “versus Darum,”
_Itin._, 298. Stubbs in a note suggested that “Darum” here was a
phonetic error for “Toron”; this the _Estoire_ practically proves;
and I venture to think the passage furnishes a little bit of evidence
on another question, for if the Latin “translator” had “al Toron
as Chevalers” before his eyes, how came he to misrender it “versus
Darum”? whereas if Ambrose found “Darum” in his friend’s notes, and
noticed that it was a mistake, he would of course correct it in his
own version of the story.
[828] See Note III at end.
[829] _Est._, ll. 7429-41; cf. _Itin._, 297.
[830] _Est._, ll. 7471-6; cf. _Itin._, 298.
[831] _Est._, ll. 7477-8; _Itin._, 299, “verum non in deliciis.”
[832] Bohadin, 292.
[833] The later high road to Jerusalem from Joppa goes by Ramlah, but
not by Amwas and Beit Nuba; it passes further south, through the Wady
Ali.
[834] _Itin._, 305.
[835] See, _e. g._, the story of the fight in which the Earl of
Leicester was nearly lost, _Est._, ll. 7480-604, _Itin._, 300-3.
[836] See Note IV at end.
[837] Cf. R. Howden, iii. 17, with Ibn Alathyr, 54, who makes the day
December 22, while Roger makes it the 23rd.
[838] Abu Shama, _Recueil_, V., 49; seemingly from “récit du Cadi,”
_i. e._ Bohadin, but the passage does not occur in either the French
or the Dutch edition of Bohadin’s work.
[839] _Est._, ll. 7617-25; cf. _Itin._, 303.
[840] “E li Turc qui bien conisseient Le rei Richart e sa baniere E
sa vistece e sa maniere,” Est., ll. 7738-40. For “e sa baniere” the
_Itin._, 307, has “_ex_ ejus imminente baneria.” Probably _e_ in l.
7739 should be _a_.
[841] _Est._, ll. 7717-60; _Itin._, 306, 307. On the localities
mentioned in this incident see Note IV at end.
[842] _Est._, ll. 7627-704; cf. _Itin._, 305.
[843] _Est._, ll. 7705-16; cf. _Itin._, 305, 306.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account