[1029] _Ib._, 344-6. He says the truce was for three years and eight months from Wednesday 22 Shaban = October 1. Ibn Alathyr (_Recueil_, II. i. 65) says three years and eight months from September 1; Imad-ed-Din (_apud_ Abu Shama, 78) says three years and three months, without any date; R. Diceto, ii. 305, and W. Newburgh, lib. iv. c. 29, make the period three years, three months, three weeks, three days and three hours from Easter 1193. Bohadin is unquestionably the best authority on the matter, especially as the final proposals on the Moslem side appear to have been actually written either by his own hand, or by the hand of the writer—whoever this may have been—who made the revised edition of his work, published with a Latin translation by Dr. Schultens at Leyden; so at least we gather from Schultens, 259—“_Conscripsi_ quae convenerant, _exaravique_ conditiones pacis.” The French version, which represents Bohadin’s original text, has merely “_On_ rédigea,” etc.; so we are left in doubt whether the first person in the Leyden version represents Bohadin himself or his reviser. Richard of Devizes (69-77) has a long and curious account of the circumstances relating to the truce. According to him, the first overtures were made and the preliminaries arranged by Hubert of Salisbury and Henry of Champagne without the knowledge of King Richard, and the matter was only referred to the king when it was so far advanced that, sick and bewildered as he was, he could do nothing but leave it in their hands and sanction their arrangements. This in itself is not impossible, nor is it irreconcileable with Bohadin’s narrative; but there are in Richard’s story details which are certainly incorrect—_e. g._, he makes Hubert and Henry apply to Safadin instead of Bedr-ed-Din, and introduces visits of Safadin in person to the camp at Joppa and to the king himself, all of which are unquestionably fictitious or imaginary. [1030] _Est._, ll. 11801-26; _Itin._, 429, 430. [1031] Bohadin, 348. [1032] _Ib._, 349, 350; _Est._, ll. 11868-75; _Itin._, 432. [1033] R. Devizes, 78. [1034] Bohadin, 350. [1035] _Est._, ll. 11835-8; _Itin._, 430. [1036] _Est._, ll. 12257-70; _Itin._, 440. [1037] _Itin._, 441; cf. _Est._, ll. 12271-2. [1038] Rigord, 118. [1039] Rigord (_l.c._), says “secundo vendidit”; R. Howden, iii. 306, when recording Guy’s death in 1195, says “cui Rex Angliae vendiderat insulam Cypri.” But Roger himself says elsewhere (181), that when Henry was chosen King of Jerusalem “rex Angliae dedit in excambium regi Guidoni insulam de Cypre in vita sua tenendam.” Ralf of Coggeshall, who also (36) places the transaction after Henry’s election in April 1192, says, “Regi Guidoni concessit, accepto ejus homagio”; and W. Newburgh (lib. iv. c. 29) says, “mera liberalitate donavit.” The version given by all these latter writers can hardly fail to be the correct one; it is inconceivable that Guy could have had means for the purchase.