Rites and Ritual: A Plea for Apostolic Doctrine and WorshipFreeman, Philip
Religion
Rites and Ritual: A Plea for Apostolic Doctrine and Worship
Freeman, Philip
Church of England -- Customs and practices; Church of England -- Liturgy; Rites and ceremonies; Ritualism; Sacraments
be fulfilled), the assent of our Right Reverend Fathers[64] in
God on the one hand, and of our congregations on the other. So
managed, the present might well become a grand and harmonious
movement of Bishops, Clergy, and people towards a noble result,--the
setting up, namely, in its due place, of the highest ordinance of
the Gospel: with variations, indeed, in many respects, as to the
mode and fashion of administration; but with one happy feature at
any rate,--a nearer approximation, both in Rites and Ritual, to
Apostolic Doctrine and Worship.
[64] See the Bishop of Oxford's opinion, delivered in Convocation.
NOTE TO THE FOURTH EDITION.
In revising the above pages for a Fourth Edition, I have corrected
the statement made by me in page 40, as to the doctrine maintained
by Archdeacon Denison; and I desire to repeat here the expression of
regret, which I have already made public through another channel, at
having misrepresented his view. A correspondence between us, since
published by him (Rivington's), will explain more fully the state
of the case. It may suffice to repeat here, that the exact position
taken up by him in 1856, as regards the points under discussion, is
expressed in the two following propositions:
Proposition III.--
"That The Body and Blood of Christ, being present naturally in
Heaven, are, supernaturally and invisibly, but Really, Present
in the Lord's Supper, through the elements, by virtue of the act
of consecration."
Proposition VIII.--
"That worship is due to The Body and Blood of Christ,
supernaturally and invisibly, but Really Present in the Lord's
Supper, 'under the form of Bread and Wine,'[65] by reason of
that Godhead with which they are personally united. But that
the elements through which 'The Body and Blood of Christ' are
given and received may not be worshipped."
[65] End of the 1st Book of Homilies.
With respect to the presence of non-communicants at the Holy
Eucharist, I had of course seen such publications as have appeared
in defence of the practice. But they fail altogether in the
essential point, which is, to show that antiquity viewed the
presence of such in any other light than either--1. As an utter
carelessness and irreverence; or 2. as befitting _penitents_, and
them only. The mediæval doctrine and practice, now being revived by
some, is that it is a good and laudable habit for Christian persons
in a state of grace to come to the Holy Communion, and to decline
receiving it.
I have to acknowledge many communications on various points; of
which I have to some extent availed myself in this edition.
APPENDIX A.
OPINIONS OF THE BISHOP OF EXETER ON CERTAIN POINTS OF DOCTRINE.
Having had occasion to receive from the Bishop of Exeter an
expression of his views on the subjects discussed in pp. 31-37, I
asked and obtained permission to embody it in an Appendix, as his
latest and most matured judgment on the matter to which it relates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account