In the course of its wanderings the stone is said to have reached Tara; and it is declared to be the famous _Lia Fáil_, or Stone of Destiny, one of the two wonders of Tara celebrated in Irish sagas. We are indebted to the _Book of Lismore_, a fifteenth-century manuscript, for an enumeration of the wonderful properties of the _Lia Fáil_. The Colloquy with the Ancients, which is comprised in this precious manuscript, records a number of Irish traditions, some of which would else in all probability have perished beyond recovery. There we learn--the account is put into the mouth of no less a personage than Ossian himself--that “Anyone of all Ireland on whom an _ex parte_ imputation rested was set upon that stone: {292} then if the truth were in him he would turn pink and white; but if otherwise, it was a black spot that in some conspicuous place would appear on him. Further, when Ireland’s monarch stepped on to it the stone would cry out under him, and her three arch-waves would boom in answer: as the wave of Cleena, the wave of Ballintoy, and the wave of Loch Rury; when a provincial king went on it the flag would rumble under him; when a barren woman trod it, it was a dew of dusky blood that broke out on it; when one that would bear children tried it, it was a ‘nursing drop’”--that is, says Mr Standish O’Grady, from whose translation I quote, semblance of milk--“that it sweated.”[292.1] The Colloquy is imperfect, the legible portion of the manuscript ceasing a line or two further on, just as we are about to be told how it was that the stone left Ireland.[292.2] Its subsequent adventures are related by Keating, who says that it was sent to Feargus the Great, “to sit upon, for the purpose of being proclaimed king of Scotland.” However, it is not to the adventures of the stone, but to its properties that I wish now to direct attention. With regard to the former, all that I need add is that the legend has been subjected by Skene, and more recently by Mr P. J. O’Reilly, to an exhaustive analysis, which renders it clear that there is no trustworthy evidence that the stone of Tara is the Coronation Stone. The antecedent improbability is great; and even if it were indisputable that the stone in question was no longer at Tara in the eleventh century, the chasm between that period and Fergus, whose very existence only rested on legend, {293} would still have to be bridged, and the variants of the story would need to be reconciled.[293.1]