Robert Merry's museum, Volumes III-IV (1842)Various
General
Robert Merry's museum, Volumes III-IV (1842)
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals
In the highest part of this leaning tower, are hung several heavy
bells, which the sexton rings, standing by them with as much coolness
as if they were within a foot of the ground. I knew nothing of these
bells, as they are situated above the story where visiters commonly
stop--when, all at once, they began ringing tremendously, directly
over my head. I never received such a start in my life; the tower
shook, and, for the moment, I actually believed it was falling. The
old sexton and his assistants, however, pulled away lustily at the
bell-ropes, and I dare say enjoyed the joke mightily; for this
practice of frightening visiters, is, I believe, a common trick with
the rogues. The wonder is, that they do not shake the tower to pieces;
as it serves for a belfry to the cathedral, on the opposite side of
the street, and the bells are rung very often.
How came the tower to lean in this manner? everybody has asked. I
examined it very attentively, and made many inquiries on this point. I
have no doubt whatever that it was built originally just as it is. The
more common opinion has been that it was erect at first, but that, by
the time a few stories had been completed, the foundation sunk on one
side, and the building was completed in this irregular way. But I
found nothing about it that would justify such a supposition. The
foundation could not have sunk without cracking the walls, and
twisting the courses of stone out of their position. Yet the walls are
perfect, and those of the inner tower are exactly parallel to the
outer ones. If the building had sunk obliquely, when but half raised,
no man in his senses, would have trusted so insecure a foundation, so
far as to raise it to double the height, and throw all the weight of
it on the weaker side. The holes for the scaffolding, it is true, are
not horizontal, which by some is considered an evidence that they are
not in their original position. But any one who examines them on the
spot, can see that these openings could not have been otherwise than
they are, under any circumstances. The cathedral, close by, is an
enormous massy building, covering a great extent of ground. It was
erected at the same time with the tower, yet no portion of it gives
any evidence that the foundation is unequal. The leaning position of
the tower was a whim of the builder, which the rude taste of the age
enabled him to gratify. Such structures were fashionable during the
middle ages. There are two other specimens of this sort of
architecture still remaining at Bologna.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account