Robert Toombs: Statesman, Speaker, Soldier, SageStovall, Pleasant A.
History
Robert Toombs: Statesman, Speaker, Soldier, Sage
Stovall, Pleasant A.
Toombs, Robert Augustus, 1810-1885
_Sir_: Military movements since Tuesday last have prevented
an earlier reply to your conversation with me on the
battlefield that evening. I understood you to say, among
other things, that "Your (my) brigade would not fight";
that you "always knew it would not fight"; that it
"pretended to want to fight, but would not"; "Where were
you when I was riding in front on my horse trying to rally
your brigade?" I desire first to know whether I am correct
in my understanding of your language, and if not, wherein I
am mistaken.
And secondly, to request of you such explanation of that
language as you may choose to give.
I am sir,
Your obedient servant,
ROBERT TOOMBS.
July 6, 1862.
_General_: Your note has just been received. My remarks
were personal to yourself and not to your brigade. I did
not in the slightest degree reflect on your men. What I
said was in substance this: "You have been wanting to
fight, and now that you have one, you have got out of it."
There were witnesses to our conversation, and if my remarks
were severer, I will let you know.
It may be well to suggest to you that, as the commanding
officer on the field, I have an official report to make
which will not be modified by your note.
It is notorious that you have a thousand times expressed
your disgust that the commanding general did not permit you
to fight. It is equally notorious that you retired from
the field. These are the two facts of which I reminded you
on Tuesday. I made no comment upon them, and if the simple
truth has been offensive, the interpretation of it has been
your own.
Yours truly,
D. H. HILL,
BRIGADIER GENERAL TOOMBS. Major General.
HEADQUARTERS FIRST BRIGADE, FIRST DIVISION,
July 6, 1862.
GENERAL D. H. HILL.
_Sir_: Your note of this date has just been received. It is
scarcely necessary for me to say it is not satisfactory. It
would be inappropriate to comment upon it properly in this
note, and for that reason alone I waive it for the present.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account