Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
108. STINE’S EXPERIMENTS. SOURCE OF X-RAYS DETERMINED BY SCIAGRAPHS OF
SHORT TUBES. _Elect. World_, N.Y., Apr. 11, ’96, pp. 392, 393.—Prof.
Stine, of the _Armour. Inst. of Tech._, by means of the diagram shown in
Fig. 1, p. 102, clearly proved that the X-rays have their source at the
area struck by the cathode rays located directly opposite the disk
marked “cathode.” If the reader will investigate the diagram and the
sciagraphs, he will obtain a clearer knowledge of the evidence than by
any verbal description, further than to explain how the elements are
related to one another. In Fig. 1, therefore, will be noticed covered
photographic plates, located as indicated with reference to the extreme
left-hand end of the discharge tube, where the cathode rays strike. The
surface of Plate 5 is parallel to that of the cathode, and the
phosphorescent spot is in line between the two above named elements. The
result is shown in Fig. 2, p. 102, the objects sciagraphed being several
short sections of tubes with diameters varying from 1/2 to 3 inches.
A, in Figs. 3, 4, p. 104 and in Figs. 5, 6, p. 112, identifies the ends
lettered A in Fig. 1. The sciagraph in Fig. 3 was obtained on the plate
shown at the top in Fig. 1; that in Fig. 4, on Plate 2; that in Fig. 5,
on Plate 3; and that in Fig. 6, on Plate 4. Not only were direct shadows
visible, but also secondary shadows, indicating, therefore, that,
although the source of practically all the rays was at the
phosphorescent spot, yet a portion of the rays came slightly from other
directions, either by reflection or by actual production of rays, upon
other portions of the tube. Look now especially at Fig. 3, p. 104. If
the rays came from the anode, then would this appearance necessarily be
the same as that in Fig. 2. Similarly, the other sciagraphs may be
considered to show that the rays do not come from the anode. In the case
of the sciagraphs in Figs. 4, 5 and 6, only a single tube acted as the
body for casting a shadow. Prof. Stine stated that the experiments were
repeated over and over again, thereby establishing the phenomena as
uniform.
109. STINE’S ELECTRICAL APPARATUS EMPLOYED. § § 106, 112, 114, 131,
137.—Prof. Stine gave the following suggestive points:
“Among the first points investigated was the influence of the
interrupter. The coil was provided, first with the familiar mercury make
and break, and then an ordinary vibrator. The mercurial device gave very
good results.
[Illustration:
STINE’S EXPERIMENT. FIG. 3, § 108, p. 104.
]
[Illustration:
STINE’S EXPERIMENT. FIG. 4, § 108, p. 104.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account