Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
116. ROWLAND, CARMICHAEL AND BRIGGS’ EXPERIMENT. AREA STRUCK BY CATHODE
RAYS ONLY AN EFFICIENT SOURCE WHEN POSITIVELY ELECTRIFIED.
_Electricity_, N.Y., Apr. 22, ’96, p. 219.—Experiments carried on at the
Johns Hopkins University led the above named investigators to think at
first that the source of the X-rays was at the anode. _Amer. Jour.
Sci._, March, ’96. Prof. Elihu Thomson was led to give the same opinion
during his first experiments. _Elect. Rev._, N.Y., Mar. 25, ’96. See
also § 112_a_. Many other experiments certify to the allegation that
X-rays are certainly generated at the phosphorescent spot on the glass.
§ 79, 105, 107, 108, 111, 112, 113. From the experiments of Prof.
Rowland, _et al._, the confusion is accounted for by the fact that they
overlooked the electrical condition of the spot struck by the cathode
rays. Prof. Rowland, _et al._, constructed a tube having a platinum
sheet located at the focus of the concave electrode, and _not_ connected
to the anode. Although the platinum became red hot, it emitted no
X-rays, but when the platinum was made the anode, there was profuse
radiation of X-rays in all directions from that side of the platinum
struck by the cathode rays, and no radiation from the other side. § 91.
(See also Roentgen and Tesla, concerning 1/2 platinum and 1/2 aluminum
and radiation therefrom.) They inferred as a final conclusion in
connection with this point, “That the necessary condition for the
production of X-rays is an anode bombardment by the cathode discharge.”
§ 113. They recognized apparently that it had been conclusively proved
that X-rays radiated from the phosphorescent spot on the glass. They
held that such a spot is “The induced anode formed on the glass.” § 49,
at end. They did not prove this by an experiment according to the
article referred to, but based it upon “The fact that the bombarding
cathode rays coming in periodical electrified showers alternately raise
and lower the potential of the glass, thus making it alternately an
anode and a cathode. In the case of the platinum, this could not occur
to the same extent.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account