Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
118. EDISON’S EXPERIMENTS. CHARACTERISTICS OF DISCHARGE TUBE,
PHOTOGRAPHIC PLATES, ELECTRICAL APPARATUS, FLUORESCENCE, ETC. _Elec.
Eng._, N.Y., Feb. 19, ’96; Mar. 18 and 25; Apr. 1, 8, 15 and 29, ’96.
X-RAYS BEGIN BEFORE STRIAE END.—The reader may remember a former
section, § 10, pointing out that striae were usually obtainable without
very high vacua, and that phosphorescence of the glass occurs only with
high vacua. § 54. In carrying the vacuum up higher and higher, Edison
observed that feeble Roentgen rays were detected before the striae
ceased. Prof. Elihu Thomson independently performed a like experiment
and found that the Roentgen rays could be obtained even when the vacuum
was so low as to produce striae. (_Elec. Eng._, N.Y., Apr. 15, ’96.)
Victor Chabaud and D. Hurmuzescu also obtained X-rays from a vacuum .025
mm., being lower than Crookes employed, which was at a maximum .001 mm.
(_L’Industrie Elect._, Paris, May 25, ’96. From trans. by Louis M.
Pignolet.)
119. REASON WHY THIN WALLS ARE BETTER THAN THICK. X-RAYS AND
POST-PHOSPHORESCENCE.—This may be understood by explanation of the
discharge tube in Fig. 1. In one experiment, the portion struck by the
cathode rays, namely B, was made 1/8 inch thick. It became soon hot and
very luminous and melted, § 61, but the X-rays were weak. When blown
thin, (§ 83) however, the glass remained cool and the X-rays were much
stronger. What is known on the market as German glass (phosphoresces
green, § 55, at centre) was found more permeable than lead glass, the
thickness of the walls being the same in both cases. There were no
lingering X-rays from after-phosphorescence, (§ 54, at end) or, if any,
could not be detected by the sciascope. The photographic test would be
objectionable because of the brief duration. Prof. Battelli and Dr.
Garbasso, of Pisa, made a very _sensitive_ test in this connection,
proving by the discharge of an electrified body (§ § 90 and 90_a_) that
feeble X-rays were emitted after the current was cut off from the
discharge tube. (From trans. by Mr. Pignolet.)
[Illustration:
DISCHARGE TUBE, FIG. 1. § 119.
DISCHARGE TUBE, FIG. 3. § 120.
]
120. TO PREVENT PUNCTURE OF THE DISCHARGE TUBE BY SPARKS.—In the
illustration, Discharge Tube Fig. 2. shows a suitable type. It is drawn
to scale, showing the correct proportion of the length to the diameter.
The shaded ends represent tinfoil on the outside and connecting with the
leading-in wires, the same preventing puncture of the glass by the
spark. They may be caused to adhere by shellac or similar glue. In place
of the metallic coating detached supplementary electrodes may be
employed, as seen in the illustration marked “Discharge Tube Fig. 3.”
The power of the X-rays was increased, being due, it was thought, to the
fact that the construction embodied the combination of internal and
external electrodes. § 121.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account