Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
the black area be so large? If the electricity and vacuum have nothing
to do with it, why should not the halos appear when photographs are
taken of flames and other sources of light in the absence of mist and
dust? In order to answer questions which will perhaps be proposed, let
it be stated that there was no visible dust nor moisture in the room,
the photograph being taken early in the evening and at a time when the
Hall was not in use. The halos were not apparent except when reproduced
by a photograph. The lamps had the usual carbon filaments hanging so
that the several filaments were in different planes, and they were of 16
candle power and were connected in parallel circuit, the average E. M.
F. being about 110 volts. The lamps were fed by the Edison direct
current dynamos. The festoon shown, is one of a dozen or more which were
suspended between the columns rising from the gallery and supporting the
roof and were hung about forty feet from the floor. The hall was further
illuminated by a huge electrolier pendant from the centre of the
ceiling. These details were obtained from Mr. Hammer, who planned the
installation.
141. ANÆSTHETIC PROPERTIES OF X-RAYS.—Tesla reported that he and his
assistants tested the action of the rays upon the human system, and
found that upon continued impact and penetration of the head by very
powerful radiations, strange effects were noticed. He was sure that from
this cause a tendency to sleep occurred (§ 84, at end), and the
faculties were benumbed. He said that time seemed to pass quickly. The
general effect was of a soothing nature, and the top of the head seemed
to feel warm under the influence of the rays. Incidentally, he noticed,
as he stated, “When working with highly strained bulbs, I frequently
experienced a sudden and sometimes even painful shock in the eye. Such
shocks may occur so often that the eye gets inflamed, and one cannot be
considered cautious if he abstains from watching the bulb too closely.”
The author calls to mind the reports in the daily press that Edison also
noticed that the eyes were in some way sensitive to the rays. The eye,
it was reported, became fatigued at the time, and yet later, objects
could be more easily distinguished.
In this connection, it should be remembered that there are not only
cathode rays, X-rays, etc., but the electric force that Lenard spoke of
in the neighborhood of the discharge tube, and in testing the effects
upon the eyes, of course, the precaution should be taken to determine
whether cathode rays, X-rays or the electric sparks are answerable for
the peculiar effects. Roentgen reasoned, § 84, that the eyes were not
sensitive, but the rays, in his case, were not strong enough to travel
40 to 60 feet, as in Tesla’s experiments, but only 2 m. (about 7 ft.).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account