Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
63_a_. DE METZ’S EXPERIMENT. CHEMICAL ACTION IN THE INTERIOR OF THE
DISCHARGE TUBE. INTERNAL CATHODE RAYS. _L’Ind. Eler._, May 10, ’96, and
_Comptes Rendus_, about April, ’96. Translated by Louis M. Pignolet. He
used a cylindrical discharge tube divided into two halves which fitted
together by an air-tight ground joint. In one-half were the anode and
the cathode; in the other half was the holder containing the sensitive
paper or films. The holder was exposed to the direct action of the
cathode rays and was closed by a cover of cardboard or sheet aluminum.
The objects to be photographed were placed between the cover and the
sensitive film or paper. The tube was connected to a Sprengel pump which
maintained its vacuum during the experiments. In this way, twelve
photographs were taken from which it appeared that cathode rays, like
X-rays, penetrate cardboard and aluminum, but are stopped by copper
(1.26 mm.) and platinum (0.32 mm.). Poincaré, in a note in the same
publications as the foregoing, criticised the results of the experiments
of De Metz, claiming they did not prove irrefutably that cathode rays
possessed the essential properties of X-rays, for the cathode rays in
impinging on the cover of the holder would generate X-rays, § 91, which
would give the results obtained. Poincaré did not deny the fact.
63_b_. HERTZ’S EXPERIMENT. THE PASSAGE OF CATHODE RAYS THROUGH THIN
METAL PLATES WITHIN THE DISCHARGE TUBE. DIFFUSION. _Wied. Ann._, N. F.
45; 28, 1892. Contributed by request, by Mr. N. D. C. Hodges of the
_Hodges Scientific News Agency_, N.Y. Found in records at Astor
Library.—A piece of uranium glass was covered partly on one side (which
he calls the front side) with gold-leaf, and on the gold leaf were
attached several pieces of mica. This front side was then exposed to
cathode rays. So long as the exhaustion had not proceeded far, and the
cathode rays filled the whole tube with a blue cone of light, only the
portion of the uranium glass outside the gold-leaf screen showed any
phosphorescence. But as soon as the exhaustion had progressed far
enough, and the light began to disappear, the genuine cathode rays
struck the covered glass, and the phosphorescence manifested itself
behind the gold-leaf. When the cathode rays were fully developed, the
gold-leaf hardly had any effect, while the mica cast deep black shadows.
The same experiment was tried with silver-leaf, aluminum and alloys of
tin, zinc and copper. Aluminum showed the best results; sheets which
allowed no light to pass, allowing the cathode rays free passage. The
rays after their passage through the metal screens did not continue
their straight course, but seemed to be diffused much as light is
diffused by passing through a cloudy medium. In this connection
reference is made to the work of Goldstein, who had noticed also the
reflection of “electric” rays. _Wied. Ann._, N. F. 15; 246, 1882. In
1893, Goldstein published further accounts concerning actions in
discharge tube. _Wied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account