Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
74. CAUSE OF LUMINOSITY OF GAS OUTSIDE THE DISCHARGE TUBE.—At ordinary
pressures, in the cases of hydrogen and air, as has been noted, the gas
became luminous in the observing tube, the effect being, of course, the
same as entering open air, represented in Fig. A, beginning of this
chapter. In order to determine the luminosity at less pressures, the
gas, of whichever kind, was enclosed in a rather long observing tube and
only at rather high vacua did the bluish and sometimes reddish gaseous
luminosity disappear. Upon grasping the tube with the hand or
approaching any conductor connected to earth, of large capacity, the
column stopped at that point so that the remainder of the tube, beyond
the hand, measured from the discharge, was dark. The phosphorescence on
the glass wall of the tube produced by the cathode rays was not
influenced in any way by outside conductors, such as the hand. Cathode
rays themselves were not stopped apparently by the hand, because the
phosphorescent screen and glass, located beyond the hand, became
luminous. He concluded, therefore, that the glowing of the gas had no
close connection with the cathode rays. He proved this also by
deflecting the cathode rays in the discharge tube from a certain space,
and yet the gaseous luminosity remained. As an exception, the cathode
rays sometimes appeared to be closely associated with the light column.
He attributed the luminosity of the gas in general, at low pressures,
not to the cathode rays, but directly to the electric current or some
kind of electric force, § 11 and 14, which, as already remarked,
permitted sparks to be drawn from the aluminum window and surrounding
points.
The negative glow light in Geissler tubes, § 30, is also to be regarded
as gas illuminated by cathode rays. (Compare Hertz, _Wied. Ann._, XIX.,
p. 807, ’83.) Between that phenomenon and the glow observed here and
attributed to irradiation, there exists a correspondence, inasmuch as in
both cases the light disappears at high exhaustions, § 53, appears
fainter and larger when the pressure increases, § 54, and then becomes
brighter and smaller, § 54. But, whereas, the glow in the Geissler tube
has become very bright and small at 0.5 mm. pressure, the gas in our
experiment remains much darker up to 760 mm. pressure, and yet the
illuminated spot is much larger. This difference cannot, therefore, be
attributed to an inferior intensity of the rays here used. But it will
be explained, § 76, as soon as we can show that at higher pressures
cathode rays of a different kind are produced, which are much more
strongly absorbed by gases than the rays investigated hitherto and
produced at very low pressures.
[Illustration:
USE OF STOPS IN SCIAGRAPHY. (PERCH.) § 107., p. 101.
By Leeds and Stokes.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account