Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
History
Roentgen Rays and Phenomena of the Anode and Cathode.
Thompson, Edward P. (Edward Pruden)
X-rays
91. Before Roentgen published in his second paper of Mar. 9, ’96, an
account of his focus tube, the Kings College published a description of
an exactly similar one, represented in the cut. See _Elec. Rev._, Lon.,
Mar. 13. ’96, p. 340. The cathode is concave and the anode is formed of
platinum and is plane and at such an angle that the X-rays generated, §
63_b_., on diffusion of internal cathode rays, will be thrown out
through the thin walls of the bulb. § 55 and 57. As the rays emanate
from a point, the shadows are much clearer, especially in conjunction
with powerful rays permitting several feet between the object and the
tube. Mr. Shallenberger was among the first, and was the first as far as
the author knows (_Elect. World_, Mar. 7, ’96, see cut reproduced) to
originate the use of an X-ray focus tube.
[Illustration:
TYPICAL FOCUS TUBE.
]
91_a_. APPARATUS EMPLOYED.—Prof. Roentgen paid tribute to Tesla, by
alluding to the advantages resulting from the use of the Tesla condenser
and transformer. In the first place, he noticed that the discharge
apparatus became less hot, and that there was less probability of its
being pierced. Again the vacuum lasted longer, at least in the case of
his particular apparatus. Above all, stronger X-rays were produced.
Again careful adjustment of the vacuum was not as necessary as with the
Ruhmkorff coil.
92. X-RAYS AND LONGITUDINAL VIBRATIONS.—Prof. Roentgen did not consider
X-rays and ultra-violet rays to be of the same nature, although they
produced many common effects. The X-rays, as he found, by the above
related experiments, behaved quite differently from the ultra-violet
rays, which are highly refrangible, practically all subject to
reflection, capable of being polarized, and absorbed according to the
density of the absorbents. For valid reasons, the X-rays cannot be
infra-red rays. While he does not affirm any theory, yet he suggests the
theory of longitudinal waves for explaining the properties of X-rays.
(This was not suggested again in his second announcement.) He stated
that the hypothesis needs a more solid foundation before acceptance. The
reason why Roentgen termed the energy X-rays is simply because X in
algebra represents an unknown quantity.
[Illustration:
SHALLENBERGER APPARATUS AND FOCUS TUBE. § 91.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account