Rogues and VagabondsSims, George R. (George Robert)
General
Rogues and Vagabonds
Sims, George R. (George Robert)
Criminals -- Fiction; London (England) -- Fiction
To all the world he was Squire Heritage; to himself he was Edward
Marston. People saw in him a benevolent country gentleman, devoted to
his wife and his young ward; he saw in himself an undiscovered forger
and thief, a criminal hiding from justice. His loving wife was a woman
he had dragged into a shameful alliance, and was one sin the more upon
his conscience. His ward was the grand-daughter of an accomplice, a man
in whose keeping lay his honour and his life. When at the county
sessions he took his seat upon the bench, he trembled lest among the
malefactors in the dock there might be some who had know him in the old
days.
But there was not much chance of his being recognised. The change of
name was a great safeguard, and added to that was the fact that his
appearance had changed too. He had aged very rapidly since his
marriage. He wore his hair long, and allowed his beard and whiskers to
grow freely. These were tinged already with grey, and altogether the
change was so complete, not only of surroundings but of appearance,
that none but those who had known him intimately and who were searching
for him would probably have recognised him.
After breakfast on the morning when we renew our acquaintance with
Edward, Ruth, and Gertie, the two ladies went up to old Mrs. Adrian’s
room, and left the gentleman alone.
Mrs. Adrian had broken rapidly after her husband’s death, and was now
unable to leave her room.
Ruth, like a loving daughter, endeavoured to make her mother feel her
loss as little as possible, and always that portion of the morning
which her husband spent in his study she and Gertie would pass with the
old lady.
They read to her, chatted with her, brought her all the news and all
the village gossip they thought she would care to hear, and sometimes,
as an extra treat, contradicted her, just to give her an opportunity of
exercising her old privilege of scolding them.
When Ruth and Gertie had gone upstairs, the squire picked up his
letters and carried them into his study.
He looked at the superscriptions carefully, and tossed some of them
aside. They were either circulars or bills, and not of pressing
importance. But one envelope he looked at long and anxiously before he
opened it.
He knew the handwriting.
It was that of Seth Preene.
Preene was the only one of the gang he had once been connected with who
still enjoyed his confidence. Preene was necessary to him, and could be
trusted. He paid him liberally for his services. But why should Preene
write to him? He had strict orders not to do so unless it was of the
first necessity. He received his allowance regularly through Mr.
Heritage’s London solicitors, and it was understood that there was to
be no direct communication unless something happened which rendered it
necessary.
What had happened?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account