Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
Scipio Africanus who had been elected proconsul without having exercised
any previous _imperium_.[652] By the close of the Republic both these
scruples had been set aside. The triumph was decreed to proconsuls
by the Senate, and without regard to their having held any previous
_imperium_.[653]
(ii.) _Powers exercised in connexion with the people._—The dealings
which the magistrate had with the assembled people were of two kinds;
he might summon them for the purpose of imparting information: in this
case the meeting was called a _contio_;[654] or he might convene them
for the purpose of passing decrees binding on the community: such an
assembly assumed one of the various forms of the _comitia_. The first
power (_contionem habere_) was often preliminary to the exercise of the
second (_cum populo agere_); for a _contio_ or a series of _contiones_
generally preceded the formal meetings of the assemblies at which laws
or _plebiscita_ were passed,[655] and was in fact an indispensable
preliminary, since, in the case of legislation, it was the chief
opportunity for recommendations or criticisms of a bill, and, in the case
of popular jurisdiction, was the only means by which the people could
form an estimate of the evidence. The magisterial _contio_ was, in fact,
the great vehicle for constitutional agitation and, as such, the most
democratic institution in Rome.
But the use of the _contio_ was not confined to the preliminaries of
legislation. It was the form in which the people were summoned to witness
any public act,[656] and to listen to the magistrate’s commands when
these were expressed in the form of verbal edicts.[657] The essential
feature of such an assembly was that the people were invited to meet a
magistrate and to listen to his views; the masses were mere auditors; and
the fact that this was no chance gathering was further emphasised by the
solemnity of the proceedings—the formal summons, the opening prayer,[658]
and the elevation of the magistrate on the tribunal. We cannot say with
certainty how far this right of holding a _contio_ extended. It was
certainly possessed by the consuls, praetors, censors, and tribunes, and
probably by all the magistrates down to the quaestor.[659] The conflict
of magisterial authority was felt here as in other departments, and the
higher magistrate could summon to himself the _contio_ convoked by an
inferior.[660]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account