Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
The review of the knights (_equitum census_,[1063] _recognitio
equitum_[1064]) took place, not like that of the rest of the citizens
in the Campus Martius, but in the Forum. The whole corps filed past
the censor man by man, each knight leading his horse by the bridle,
as the herald called his name.[1065] The first question considered by
the censors was that of discharge. While the knights were still the
cavalry of Rome, the service was a burden, and a burden that from the
close of the second century of the Republic was made incompatible with
a seat in the Senate.[1066] In the Gracchan period, as we have seen,
ten years’ service had to be proved before the knight could claim his
dismissal.[1067] The discharge was usually granted, if the conditions had
been fulfilled, but the censors, as a penal measure, claimed the right
of not allowing past service to count, and even of imposing additional
service at the knight’s own expense.[1068] Ignominious discharge, before
the completed term of service, was a consequence of military negligence,
as shown, for instance, by the shabby condition of the public horse
(_impolitia_),[1069] or of any moral blemish, which in other ranks of
life would have entailed dismissal from the Senate or the tribes. The
form of dismissal was “sell your horse” (_vende equum_), of retention
“lead it on” (_traduc equum_).[1070] The censors’ final duty was to fill
up the vacant gaps in the centuries. This was done by the enrolment, at
their own discretion, of qualified members from the infantry (_pedites_).
This procedure was but one example of that wider censure which was
directed against the citizen body at the time of its registration in
the Campus Martius. This scrutiny was preceded by an edict in which the
censors declared some of their moral canons—canons, we may believe, that
were transmitted from college to college and seldom departed from—while
they animadverted on new evils which they believed to be undermining the
life of the state.[1071] The acts which called forth their censure may be
conveniently considered under four heads.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account