Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
We have seen that the powers on which Augustus based his position as
Princeps were the _proconsulare imperium_ and the _tribunicia potestas_.
In the theory of a constitution which he presented to the world the first
of these prerogatives was supposed to establish his power outside Rome
and Italy, the second, with its purely civic traditions, to be the basis
of his influence within the central state. His object in exalting the
tribunician power to the first place in Rome and her Italian dependencies
now merged in the city, was to conceal as carefully as possible the
military basis of his rule. The unlimited _imperium_ was to be felt only
by his army and his provincial subjects.
It needed little reflection to show that this principle, although
in appearance the most important that underlay the Principate, was
practically unworkable. Government in Rome was inconceivable without an
_imperium_, and supreme government impossible without one of such an
indefinite character that it should seem to stand out of relation to the
regular and limited _imperia_ of consuls and praetors. This power was
secured by an easy juristic device. By a special exemption, which had its
prototypes in Republican history, the Emperor was allowed to _retain_
the full _imperium_ within the walls;[1585] and lawyers were careful not
to declare explicitly what was implied in this retention. It might have
meant—as it would have meant during the Republic—that the Emperor was not
debarred by his presence in Rome from holding command abroad. It might
signify that the limitations imposed by the city walls now rendered the
proconsular a quasi-consular _imperium_, and this was perhaps the ruling
theory. But a different line of interpretation would have rendered it
easy to show that the _imperium_ here as elsewhere was unlimited. The
nebulous atmosphere of this mockery of a magistracy was as well suited
to the despot as to the constitutional ruler. In the actual position
of the Princeps within Rome we find traces of all these theories. As
a provincial ruler he governs from the capital; as commander-in-chief
he keeps his praetorian guards in Italy and his fleets at Ravenna and
Misenum; while as the wielder of an undefined but civic _imperium_ he
gives justice, as a court of first instance or a court of appeal, and
issues edicts to supplement the laws.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account