Roman Public LifeGreenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
History
Roman Public Life
Greenidge, A. H. J. (Abel Hendy Jones)
Constitutional history -- Rome; Rome -- Politics and government
The lack of any definite principle of succession combined with the
warring forces within the Empire to make the position of a ruling Emperor
one of dazzling uncertainty. The possibility of election by the legions
created a rude standard of merit, and it is questionable whether any
really incapable man ever sat on the Roman throne. But usurpation was
often followed by dethronement, tyranny by death or posthumous disgrace;
and although such expulsions, executions, and censures were practically
the work of the army, it is of some importance for the constitutional
theory of the Principate to determine the legal form which dethronement
or condemnation assumed.
As it was the Senate, representing the people, which gave, so it was
this power which took away the Principate; and the act of deposition
is attested in the cases of Nero, Didius Julianus, and Maximin.[1692]
Deposition was followed by death, and then came the condemnation of the
reign, one that might follow even when the death of the tyrant had not
been directly ordered by the government.[1693] In its extremest form this
was a condemnation of the memory (_damnatio memoriae_) of the late ruler
on the ground that he was a traitor (_perduellis_).[1694] His _acta_ were
rescinded, his name erased from the records. A milder form of censure was
the mere neglect of his _acta_ in the form that no oath to observe them
was sworn by magistrates and senators.[1695] In the latter case there was
no wholesale rescission of the acts, and each special case in which the
late Emperor had decided was approved on its individual merits.
On the other hand the acceptance of a reign took the twofold form of
an oath to observe the _acta_ of the dead Emperor[1696] and a vote to
assign him a place amongst the deified Caesars. The prospect of this
posthumous recognition of the merits of a reign must often have exercised
a stimulating influence on the occupant of the throne,[1697] although it
was somewhat spoilt by the consciousness that the decision of the Senate
would, to a large extent, be guided by the wishes of his successor in
office.
§ 4. _The other Powers in the State—the Magistracy, the Comitia, and the
Senate_
(1) _The Magistracy_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account