These tribes were, like the earlier ones, local, and although there is no evidence for the view that landholders alone were included in them, yet the seventeen country tribes would naturally consist for the most part of peasant proprietors, and would, therefore, be a better organ for plebeian sentiment than the _curiae_, throughout which the landless plebeian clients might still be the representatives of their patrician lords. This change soon produced an unexpected consequence. At some period between the passing of the Publilian law and the enactment of the Twelve Tables, the new plebeian practice was adopted as a basis for gatherings of the whole people. The Populus began to meet by tribes, and to form a _comitia tributa_. The Twelve Tables prove that this body early gained judicial competence;[386] but the history of the great change which placed a democratic assembly of the Populus by the side of the timocratic _comitia centuriata_ is wholly unknown to us. It is probable that the original power of this new parliament was not extensive, and it may have been confined originally to the hearing of minor judicial appeals from the magistrates. About twenty years later it was found convenient to entrust the election of quaestors to the new assembly. Its attractiveness lay in the ease and rapidity with which the people might be summoned to meet by tribes within the walls, as compared with the stately formalities of the gathering of the army in the Campus. The second great movement of the tribunate was an attempt to secure an equal administration of the law.