English essays -- 19th century; Great Britain -- Social life and customs; London (England) -- Description and travel
“And they want to get up a testimonial to this man's memory--a statue or
something!” cries Jawkins. “A man who wallows in wealth and takes paper
away from his Club! I don't say he is not brave. Brutal courage most men
have. I don't say he was not a good officer: a man with such experience
MUST have been a good officer unless he was a born fool. But to think
of this man loaded with honors--though of a low origin--so lost to
self-respect as actually to take away the 'Athenaeum' paper! These
parvenus, sir, betray their origin--betray their origin. I said to my
wife this very morning, 'Mrs. Jawkins,' I said, 'there is talk of a
testimonial to this man. I will not give one shilling. I have no idea
of raising statues to fellows who take away Club paper. No, by George, I
have not. Why, they will be raising statues to men who take Club spoons
next! Not one penny of MY money shall they have!'”
And now, if you please, we will tell the real story which has furnished
this scandal to a newspaper, this tattle to Club gossips and loungers.
The Field-Marshal, wishing to make a further provision for a friend,
informed his lawyer what he desired to do. The lawyer, a member of the
“Athenaeum Club,” there wrote the draft of such a codicil as he would
advise, and sent the paper by the post to Lord Clyde at Chatham. Lord
Clyde finding the paper perfectly satisfactory, signed it and sent it
back: and hence we have the story of “the codicil bearing the signature
of Clyde, F. M., and written, strange to say, upon paper bearing the
'Athenaeum Club' mark.”
Here I have been imagining a dialogue between a half-dozen gossips such
as congregate round a Club fireplace of an afternoon. I wonder how many
people besides--whether any chance reader of this very page has read
and believed this story about the good old lord? Have the country papers
copied the anecdote, and our “own correspondents” made their remarks on
it? If, my good sir, or madam, you have read it and credited it, don't
you own to a little feeling of shame and sorrow, now that the trumpery
little mystery is cleared? To “the new inhabitant of light,” passed away
and out of reach of our censure, misrepresentation, scandal, dulness,
malice, a silly falsehood matters nothing. Censure and praise are alike
to him--
“The music warbling to the deafened ear,
The incense wasted on the funeral bier,”
the pompous eulogy pronounced over the gravestone, or the lie that
slander spits on it. Faithfully though this brave old chief did his
duty, honest and upright though his life was, glorious his renown--you
see he could write at Chatham on London paper; you see men can be found
to point out how “strange” his behavior was.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account