International relations -- Fiction; Liaoyang, Battle of, Liaoyang, China, 1904 -- Fiction; War correspondents -- Fiction
“In the fifty-seven years between the battles of Plassey and Waterloo,
England looted a billion in pounds sterling--five thousand million
dollars--from the conquered Indian people. This was the price India
paid for bondage, for ruined industries and periodic famines. This
was the period of England’s military expansion. The army that crushed
Napoleon was fed and clothed and armed by Indian tributes.”
Neither spoke for a moment, and the stranger added with an
impressiveness that Mr. Jasper never forgot: “It is rather stirring to
remember that this old India was highly civilized, in a rich meaning of
the expression, ripe in arts, letters, and incomparable philosophies,
when the ancestors of the English were painted savages. India was the
leader of Asiatic civilization, and perhaps the richest country in the
world, when England broke in upon her. What is old India now? Hearken
to the souls passing in little Rydamphur to-night!”
“But what, in God’s name, can be done?” Mr. Jasper demanded.
“When England begins to treat India as she would be forced to treat a
colony of white men, aggressive as Americans, for instance, India will
begin to discover her gray of morning.”
“But England won’t do that until India becomes a militant people.”
“No, I’m afraid not. England still has much of her imperialistic
arrogance.... A little while ago, one of the ablest of the native
editors, an old man, was banished from the country for six years
because he published an article in his paper pointing out his country’s
misfortunes. This aged editor was a Murahti, and during his trial
called for a Murahti jury. On the contrary, the jury was made of
English and Parsees. The prisoner did not know a word of the court’s
proceedings until an interpreter informed him of his banishment.
Another young Hindu nobleman was recently banished for life because
he took part in public speeches. The English judge who sentenced this
young man declared that there was no reason for one Hindu addressing
a gathering of Hindus, since the latter had no votes. I call that a
rather interesting political homily.”
“It is chief among outrages,” declared Mr. Jasper.
The other regarded him intently a moment, as if deliberating whether it
were wise to go a bit farther. He studied the deep and honest interest
in the perspiring face, and caught up the question afresh:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account