Rude Stone Monuments in All Countries: Their Age and UsesFergusson, James
History
Rude Stone Monuments in All Countries: Their Age and Uses
Fergusson, James
Megalithic monuments
Before proceeding, it may be as well to revert for one moment to Hob
Hurst's House. It is quoted here to show how a tumulus, with a dolmen
on the top of it, may be connected with a low rampart so as not to
conceal it, exactly, I believe, as is the case with Arthur's Quoit.
But the name of the place where it is situated may afford a hint which
may lead to something hereafter. It will be recollected that Arthur's
sixth battle was fought "super flumen quod vocatur Bassas." This mound
is situated on "Bas" Moor, the Low being merely the name of the mound
itself. These nominal similarities are too treacherous to be relied
upon; but the more the whole group is looked at the more does it appear
that there are coincidences of name, or form, or purpose, between
those monuments here called Arthurian, which cannot all be accidental.
Individually they may not be able to resist hostile criticism, but in
their cumulative form they appear to me to make up a very strong case
indeed.
If any of the other dolmens in the West had even so good a title to
a date as Arthur's Quoit, it might be possible to arrange them in a
series; but as none have even traditional dates, all we can now do is
to suggest that the dolmen at Plas Newydd (woodcut No. 50) is of about
the same age as Arthur's Stone: perhaps something more modern, as it
is more carefully squared; but this may arise from the one being a
battle-stone, the other a peaceful sepulchre. In like manner it would
seem that such an exaggerated form as Pentre Ifan (woodcut No. 49) is
a "tour de force" of a still more modern date; and if we could get
one certainly older than any of these, a tentative scheme could be
constructed which might lead us to satisfactory results.
I by no means despair of being able eventually to construct such a
scheme of classification, and, even before this Work is concluded, to
make it tolerably clear that the thing is possible, and then it will
only remain, if one or two fixed or probable dates can be ascertained,
to bring the whole within the range of historical investigation.
[Footnote 134: 'Iter Curiosum,' pl. xxxiii.]
[Footnote 135: 'Iter Curiosum,' p. xxxii.]
[Footnote 136: When I was there four years ago I was fortunate
enough to find an old man, a stonemason, who had been employed in
his youth in utilizing these stones. He went over the ground with
me, and pointed out the position of those he remembered.]
[Footnote 137: It is extremely difficult to be precise about the
dimensions. One is almost wholly buried in the earth, and its
dimensions can only be obtained by probing; the other is half
buried.]
[Footnote 138: 'Archæologia,' ii. 1773, p. 107.]
[Footnote 139: 'Wanderings of an Antiquary;' London, 1854, p. 175
_et seq._]
[Footnote 140: _loc. cit._ 175.]
[Footnote 141: 'Mon. Hist. Brit.' p. 299.]
[Footnote 142: 'Beowulf: an Anglo-Saxon Poem,' translated by J. W.
Kemble, 1835, preface, p. xix.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account