Rude Stone Monuments in All Countries: Their Age and UsesFergusson, James
History
Rude Stone Monuments in All Countries: Their Age and Uses
Fergusson, James
Megalithic monuments
In like manner we seem to have a dolmen-building race who from the
south first touched in Cornwall, and thence spread northwards, settling
on both sides of St. George's Channel, and leaving traces of their
existence on the south and both coasts of Ireland, as well as in Wales
and the west of England generally. Whether these two opposite currents
were or were not synchronous is a question that must be determined
hereafter. We shall also be in a better position to ascertain what the
races were who thus spread themselves along our coasts, when we have
examined the only countries from which it is probable they could have
issued.
[Footnote 271: 'The Sculptured Stones of Scotland.' Two vols.
quarto. Published by the Spalding Club. 1856 and 1867.]
[Footnote 272: A few years ago the late Mr. Rhind, of Sibster,
left an estate worth more than 400_l._ per annum, to endow a
Professorship of Archæology in Scotland, who was also to act as
curator of the monuments themselves, but unfortunately left it
encumbered by a life interest to a relative. Two years ago an
attempt was made to get the Government to anticipate the falling
in of the life interest, and appointing Mr. Stuart to the office
at once. It was, perhaps, too much to expect so enlightened an act
of liberality from a Government like ours. But their decision is
to be regretted; not only because we may thereby lose altogether
the services of the best qualified man in Scotland for the purpose,
but more so because the monuments are themselves fast disappearing
without any record of them being preserved. Agriculture is very
merciless towards a big stone or a howe that stands in the way of
the plough, and in so improving a country as Scotland, very little
may remain for the next generation to record.]
[Footnote 273: The account of these monuments is abstracted from a
paper by Lieutenant Thomas, of H. M.'s surveying vessel _Woodlark_.
It is the most detailed and most correct survey we have of any
British group. It was published in the 'Archæologia,' xxxiv. p. 88
_et seq._]
[Footnote 274: Four stones are represented as standing when
Barry's view of the monument was published in 1807, and four
are represented as standing in a series of etchings made by the
Duchess-Countess of Sutherland from her own drawings, in 1805. If
the elbow in the bridge shown in the drawing in the frontispiece
is not a licence permitted to himself by the artist, my drawing is
earlier than either of these. When I first purchased it I believed
it to be by Daniel. His tour, however, took place in 1815. From the
internal evidence this drawing must be anterior to 1805.]
[Footnote 275: 'Archæologia,' xxxiv. p. 89.]
[Footnote 276: 'Archæologia,' xxxiv. p. 90.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account