Rulers of kings: A novelAtherton, Gertrude Franklin Horn
General
Rulers of kings: A novel
Atherton, Gertrude Franklin Horn
Statesmen -- Fiction
“Good God!” she exclaimed. “And this is the twentieth century! Have I
heard aright? Am I a prisoner under an armed guard? Am I more helpless
in the eyes of the law than the meanest of your subjects? May any
illiterate peasant woman seek redress in the courts of justice while
a princess of the realm, whose supreme advantages have set her apart
from mankind, is but a chattel among the possessions of her father? I
suppose I have known this. But I have managed to surround myself with a
different atmosphere. But you--you are a man of the world, and all your
faculties are still alert--do you mean to tell me that you have not
outgrown the barbarism of the past?”
“You may call it by what name you will. I shall go now, and you will
meditate--”
But Ranata had flashed between him and the door, and he knew that he
could not pass her. He was deeply annoyed that he had not retreated in
time, but he stood immobile, looking coldly into her distorted face.
“No,” she said hoarsely, but still retaining an appreciable measure of
self-control; “you will not leave this room until you have heard the
truth for once. If you are no longer my father but my tyrant, then from
this moment I am your most rebellious subject and nothing more. And
I would that I could open my veins and drain out every drop of royal
blood. Has it ever occurred to you, sir, that the great enlightened
masses not only in America but here in central Europe regard us
not with the hatred of half a century ago, but with impatience and
contempt; that they look upon us as anomalies, anachronisms, ornamental
nuisances, and do not rise to let out our blood on the guillotine
only because they are well aware of the peaceful disintegration,
the irresistible rising of the tide of independence and liberty?
If your people love you--here, not in Hungary!--it is for your
personal qualities, not because you represent an idea which, in their
estimate of life and civilization, they have relegated to the past,
with crinolines and Bath chairs. Do you suppose that what loyalty
you enjoy will be transferred to the Heir? You know it will not.
That alone is proof enough that the people are carelessly--perhaps
unconsciously--determined to have what they want--monarchy, only if
it happen to suit them at the moment. There is only one monarchy on
the face of the earth enlightened enough to grasp this fact before
it is too late, and that is England. There alone is monarchy not
ridiculous--and not threatened. What do you suppose is the meaning of
the immense and undaunted increase of socialism in Germany? What is the
meaning of the incalculable and persistent forces of disintegration
in this empire? Look at Italy. At Spain. At Turkey. At Russia--that
dares not sleep. Only the insignificant little monarchies are
comparatively safe from themselves, being occupied with apprehension
of the greater. Even in the United States the unsatisfied tide of
liberty is rising. McKinley was not shot by a lunatic, a fanatic, nor
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account