spirit and candour worthy of his character. "I am extremely afflicted
to understand from you that Prince Rupert and yourself should be upon
so unkindly terms, and I protest, I have cordially endeavoured, with
all my interest in His Highness, to incline him to a friendship with
your Lordship, conceiving it a matter of advantage to my Master's
service, to have a good intelligence between persons so eminently
employed in his affairs, and likewise the great obligation and
inclination I had to either of you. But truly, my Lord, I often found
this a hard matter to hold between you; and your last letter gives me
cause to think that your Lordship _is not altogether free from what he
accused you of_, as the reason of his jealousies. Which was that you
both say and do things to his prejudice, _contrary to your professions,
and not in an open and direct line, but obscurely and obliquely_; and
this, under your Lordship's pardon, I find your letter very full of.
For where your Lordship would excuse him of the particular and general
aspersions, yet you come with such objections against the conduct of
that business, as would, to men ignorant of the Prince, make him
incapable of common-sense in his profession. For my part, my Lord, I
am so well acquainted with the Prince's ways, that I am confident all
his General officers and commanders knew beforehand how, and in what
manner, he intended to fight; and when, as you say, all mankind were of
opinion to fight, it was his part to put it into execution. Were any
man in the army dissatisfied in his directions, {176} or in the order,
he ought to have informed the General of it, and to have received
further satisfaction. And for the not calling of a Council at that
instant, truly, the Prince having before laid his business, were there
need of it, the blame must be as much yours as any man's." And, after
a great deal more to the same purpose, Legge concludes with the stout
declaration, "and assure yourself you are not free from great blame
towards Prince Rupert. And no man will give you this free language at
a cheaper rate than myself, though many discourse of it."[53]
[1] Clarendon, Bk. VII. p. 96, _note_.
[2] King to Rupert, 26 May, 1644. Rupert Correspondence. Add. MSS.
18981
[3] Warburton, III. p. 16.
[4] Add. MSS. 18981. Digby to Rupert, Aug. 15, 1644.
[5] Carte's Letters, I. 63. 13 Sept. 1644.
[6] Carte's Ormonde, IV. 190. 13 Aug. 1644.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Carte's Ormonde. VI. 206. 13 Oct. 1644.
[9] Ibid. Vol. VI. 203. 3 Oct. 1644.
[10] Add. MSS. 18981. King to Rupert, Aug. 30, 1644.
[11] Ibid. Sept. 23, 1644. Digby to Rupert.
[12] Rupert to Legge. Oct. 16, 1644. Warburton, III. p. 27.
[13] Warburton, II. 172, and III. 16.
[14] Warburton, III. p. 52.
[15] Warburton, III. p. 73. Rupert to Legge, Mar. 31, 1645.
[16] Clarendon, Bk. IX. p. 30.
[17] Carte's Letters, I. 86-87, 25 May, 1645.
[18] Warburton, III. p. 21.
[19] Ibid. p. 22.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account