The business remained unfinished, but the Elector's letters to his
brother were still in a most friendly and affectionate strain;
addressed always to his "tres-cher Frere," and signed "tres-cher frere,
votre tres affectionne, et fidele frere et serviteur," they are full of
good-will, and wishes for "une prompte et bonne expedition" in Rupert's
affairs. Occasionally they assume the old tone of jesting familiarity;
in one letter Charles laments that the poems--"nos poesies"--forwarded
to his brother have miscarried; and in another, remarks, in the true
polyglot style of the Palatines, "Le Duc de Simmeren nous a vu a Hort,
en passant pour etre au bapteme d'un fils de Madame la Landgrave de
Cassel, ou je suis prie aussi; but I do not love to go
a-gossipping."[14] In August he anticipated a petty war with the
Bishop of Speyer, but he hastily declined Rupert's prompt offer of
assistance. "I am deeply obliged for the offer you make me, but I
should be desolated to think that you neglected your own more pressing
business for a dispute of so little consequence."[15] In truth, the
less his brother interfered in Palatine politics, the better pleased
was the Elector. Rupert, he once wrote to his sister Sophie, {289}
might suit very well with those who cared "to propagate the gospel by
the sword," but he, for his part, loved "peace and concord."[16]
His concord with Rupert was not of long duration, and this time the
causa belli was a woman. The Elector had married, in 1650, Charlotte
of Hesse Cassel, but the marriage was not a happy one. The Electress
was of a violent temper, jealous and unreasonable to the last degree,
and Charles Louis, wearying of his attempts to win her affections,
permitted his wandering fancy to dwell on a certain Louise Von
Degenfeldt, a girl not only beautiful, but clever enough to write her
love-letters in Latin. Most unfortunately, the Baroness Louise also
fascinated--quite unconsciously--the Elector's brother Rupert. At the
same time the Electress conceived a violent admiration for her gallant
brother-in-law, and the situation was, as may well be imagined,
somewhat critical. The explosion was caused by a letter which Rupert
wrote to Louise, complaining bitterly of her coldness towards him. The
letter, which was without superscription, fell into the hands of the
Electress, who, believing it intended for herself, received it with
delight. It was her chief desire, just then, to appear to Rupert the
most fascinating person in her court, and, encouraged by his letter,
she assured him publicly that he had no cause to complain of lack of
affection on her part. Rupert, who had evidently not learnt to command
his countenance, was overcome with confusion, and blushed so furiously
as to show the Electress her mistake. Thenceforth the Electress abused
and persecuted Louise for having endeavoured to win the Prince's love,
of which crime, at least, she was perfectly innocent.[17]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account