Many believed him to have been Rupert's lawful son, and there seem to
have been some grounds for the belief. He was universally known as
"Dudley Rupert", and his mother maintained to the end of her days that
she had been Rupert's wife. Her claim was practically acknowledged in
Germany, where morganatic marriages were already in fashion; and even
in England rumours of it were rife. "Some say Prince Rupert, in his
last sickness, owned his marriage," says a letter in the Verney
Correspondence, "if so, his son is next heir, after him, to the
Palsgrave.[49] But no public acknowledgment ever took place, and
Rupert styled the boy in his will, "Dudley {360} Bard." On the other
hand, he bequeathed to him property entailed on heirs male, and the
Emperor actually paid to Francesca, after her son's death, the sum of
20,000 crowns which he had owed to Rupert.[50]
It seems possible that there was some kind of marriage,[51] but that
such marriages were of rather doubtful legality. It could not have
given Dudley royal rank, and hardly even a claim to the Palatinate,[52]
for, had such a claim existed, Rupert would certainly have put his son
forward when the House of Simmern was crying out for an heir. His
niece, Elizabeth Charlotte of Orleans, declared that he had deceived
Francesca with a false marriage. But the good Duchess was notoriously
ignorant of her uncle's affairs, and added to her story several
impossible circumstances which tend to discredit it, asserting, among
other things, that Rupert had been lodging at the time, in Henry Bard's
house, though Bard had been dead nearly ten years.[53] Moreover, such
treachery is at variance with Rupert's whole character and all his
known actions, and, though he cannot be said to have treated Francesca
well, he may at least be acquitted of the baseness suggested by his
niece.
During Rupert's life-time no mention is made of Francesca in letters or
papers, public or private. Yet, after his death, we find frequent
reference to her as to a well-known personage. Two reasons for her
retirement suggest themselves. In the first place she was, as she
herself asserted, too virtuous to care to have any dealings with the
corrupt Court, and in the second place she was a devout Roman Catholic.
Considering the prevalent horror of "Popery," the fanatical agitation
concerning the second marriage of the Duke of {361} York, and Rupert's
position as the popular hero, it may be that Francesca's religion made
him unwilling to bring her forward publicly. But, be the exact facts
of his connection with her what they may, that bond was probably the
true reason for his obdurate refusal to hear of any other marriage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account