_The nature of the conflict._—The mutual interest of all whose energies are used in production, that the total product of wealth should be as great as possible, is often disturbed by doubt as to the fair division of what is produced. Under the modern factory system, the multitude sustain the relation of employés to a comparatively few employers. Antipathies are liable at any time to arise between these two classes of workers. Those who officially control wealth in great enterprises are subject to suspicion of unfair treatment of their less independent employés. Ignorance among the mass of laborers of the intricacies of business life contributes to such suspicion. In fact, the so-called conflict of capital and labor is a struggle for and against profits. Interest and rent are only indirectly involved in the question. The manager’s profits may be assumed by both manager and wage-earners to arise from reduction of wages. The necessary reticence of business managers and the frequent arbitrary decisions as to wages help the wage-earner to feel that his interests conflict with those of his employer. It is well for all to realize that this conflict, when there is one, is not so much between the rich and the poor as between the struggler for profits and the struggler for wages. In many instances the true solution lies in the same direction, if both could see the facts alike. It is an acknowledged fact that generous wages make enlightened, energetic laborers, and that greater profits come in the long series of undertakings from the most intelligent service. A farm-hand at $20 a month is sometimes worth more than two at $15. On the other hand, if markets are low and profits decline, permanence of employment will depend upon a readiness of wage-earners to accept a new adjustment of wages to conditions. Everything which fosters a better understanding between profit-makers and wage-earners contributes to the welfare of both. Everything which hinders such understanding injures the welfare of both. The cost of such friction is borne by both parties. But in the long run, the wage-earners are liable to carry the larger part. Even the destruction of property by rust, decay, or even violence, comes back upon the wage-earners who might have been employed in its use, quite as truly as upon the manager whose profits and accumulations are wasted.