Russian literatureKropotkin, Petr Alekseevich, kniaz
History
Russian literature
Kropotkin, Petr Alekseevich, kniaz
Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
Many felt offended, in reading this epopee, to see their hero,
Napoléon, reduced to such small proportions, and even ridiculed. But
the Napoléon who came to Russia was no longer the man who had inspired
the armies of the _sans-culottes_ in their first steps eastwards for
the abolition of serfdom, absolutism, and inquisition. All men in high
positions are actors to a great extent--as Tolstóy so wonderfully shows
in so many places of his great work--and Napoléon surely was not the
least actor among them. And by the time he came to Russia, an emperor,
now spoiled by the adulation of the courtiers of all Europe and the
worship of the masses, who attributed to him what was attributable
to the vast stir of minds produced by the Great Revolution, and
consequently saw in him a half-god--by the time he came to Russia, the
actor in him had got the upper hand over the man in whom there had
been formerly incarnated the youthful energy of the suddenly-awakened
French nation, in whom had appeared the expression of that awakening,
and through whom its force had been the further increased. To these
original characteristics was due the fascination which the name of
Napoléon exercised upon his contemporaries. At Smolénsky, Kutúzoff
himself must have experienced that fascination when, rather than rouse
the lion to a desperate battle, he opened before him the way to retreat.
ANNA KARÉNINA.
Of all the Tolstóy novels, _Anna Karénina_ is the one which has been
the most widely read in all languages. As a work of art it is a
master-piece. From the very first appearance of the heroine, you feel
that this woman must bring with her a drama; from the very outset her
tragical end is as inevitable as it is in a drama of Shakespeare. In
that sense the novel is true to life throughout. It is a corner of
real life that we have before us. As a rule, Tolstóy is not at his
best in picturing women--with the exception of very young girls--and I
don’t think that Anna Karénina herself is as deep, as psychologically
complete, and as living a creation as she might have been; but the more
ordinary woman, Dolly, is simply teeming with life. As to the various
scenes of the novel--the ball scenes, the races of the officers, the
inner family life of Dolly, the country scenes on Lévin’s estate, the
death of his brother, and so on--all these are depicted in such a way
that for its artistic qualities _Anna Karénina_ stands foremost even
amongst the many beautiful things Tolstóy has written.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account