Russian literatureKropotkin, Petr Alekseevich, kniaz
History
Russian literature
Kropotkin, Petr Alekseevich, kniaz
Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
In the forties of the nineteenth century the theatre was treated
everywhere with great respect--and more than anywhere else was this
the case in Russia. Italian opera had not yet reached the development
it attained at St. Petersburg some twenty years later, and Russian
opera, represented by poor singers, and treated as a step-daughter by
the directors of the Imperial Theatres, offered but little attraction.
It was the drama and occasionally the ballet, when some star like
Fanny Elsler appeared on the horizon, which brought together the best
elements of educated society and aroused the youth of all classes,
including the university students. The dramatic stage was looked
upon--to speak in the style of those years--as “a temple of Art,” a
centre of far-reaching educational influence. As to the actors and
actresses, they endeavoured, in their turn, not merely to render on
the stage the characters created by the dramatist; they did their best
to contribute themselves, like Cruickshank in his illustrations of
Dickens’s novels, to the final creation of the character, by finding
its true personification.
Especially at Moscow did this intellectual intercourse between the
stage and society go on, and a superior conception of dramatic art
was there developed. The intercourse which Gógol established with
the actors who played his _Inspector-General_, and especially with
SCHÉPKIN; the influence of the literary and philosophical circles
which had then their seat at Moscow; and the intelligent appreciation
and criticism of their work which the actors found in the Press--all
this concurred in making of the Moscow Mályi Teátr (Small Theatre) the
cradle of a superior dramatic art. While St. Petersburg patronised
the so-called “French” school of acting--declamatory and unnaturally
refined--the Moscow stage attained a high degree of perfection in the
development of the naturalistic school. I mean the school of which Duse
is now such a great representative, and to which Lena Ashwell owed her
great success in _Resurrection_; that is, the school in which the actor
parts with the routine of conventional stage tradition, and provokes
the deepest emotions in his audience by the depth of his own real
feeling and by the natural truth and simplicity of its expression--the
school which occupies the same position on the stage that the realism
of Turguéneff and Tolstóy occupies in literature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account