Russian literatureKropotkin, Petr Alekseevich, kniaz
History
Russian literature
Kropotkin, Petr Alekseevich, kniaz
Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
In conclusion, a few words, at least, must be said about his “_Verse in
Prose_,” or “_Senilia_” (1882). These are “flying remarks, thoughts,
images,” which he wrote down from 1878 onwards under the impression of
this or that fact of his own personal life, or of public life. Though
written in prose, they are true pieces of excellent poetry, some of
them real gems; some deeply touching and as impressive as the best
verses of the best poets (_Old Woman_; _The Beggar_; _Másha_; _How
Beautiful, how Fresh were the Roses_); while others (_Nature_, _The
Dog_) are more characteristic of Turguéneff’s philosophical conceptions
than anything else he has written. And finally, in _On the Threshold_,
written a few months before his death, he expressed in most poetical
accents his admiration of those women who gave their lives for the
revolutionary movement and went on the scaffold, without being even
understood at the time by those for whom they died.
TOLSTÓY--CHILDHOOD AND BOYHOOD
More than half a century ago, _i. e._ in 1852, the first story of
Tolstóy, _Childhood_, soon followed by _Boyhood_, made its appearance
in the monthly review, _The Contemporary_, with the modest signature,
“L. N. T.” The little story was a great success. It was imbued with
such a charm; it had such freshness, and was so free of all the
mannerism of the literary trade, that the unknown author at once became
a favourite, and was placed by the side of Turguéneff and Gontcharóff.
There are excellent children’s stories in all languages. Childhood
is the period of life with which many authors have best succeeded
in dealing. And yet no one, perhaps, has so well described the life
of children from within, from their own point of view, as Tolstóy
did. With him, it is the child itself which expresses its childish
feelings, and it does this so as to compel the reader to judge
full-grown people with the child’s point of view. Such is the realism
of _Childhood_ and _Boyhood_--that is, their richness in facts caught
from real life--that a Russian critic, Písareff, developed quite a
theory of education chiefly on the basis of the data contained in these
two stories of Tolstóy’s.
It is related somewhere that one day, during their rambles in the
country, Turguéneff and Tolstóy came across an old hack of a horse
which was finishing its days in a lonely field. Tolstóy entered at
once into the feelings of the horse and began to describe its sad
reflections so vividly, that Turguéneff, alluding to the then new ideas
of Darwinism, could not help exclaiming, “I am sure, Lyov Nikoláevitch,
that you _must_ have had horses among your ancestors!” In the capacity
of entirely identifying himself with the feelings and the thoughts of
the beings of whom he speaks, Tolstóy has but few rivals; but with
children this power of identification attains its highest degree. The
moment he speaks of children, Tolstóy becomes himself a child.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account