Russian literatureKropotkin, Petr Alekseevich, kniaz
History
Russian literature
Kropotkin, Petr Alekseevich, kniaz
Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
His experiences and reflections in these new surroundings, we know from
his _Cossacks_. But it was there also that in the face of the beautiful
nature which had so powerfully inspired Púshkin and Lérmontoff he found
his true vocation. He sent to the _Contemporary_ his first literary
experiment, _Childhood_, and this first story, as he soon learned from
a letter of the poet Nekrásoff, editor of the review, and from the
critical notes of Grigórieff, Annenkoff, Druzhínin, and Tchernyshévskiy
(they belonged to four different æsthetical schools), proved to be a
_chef d’œuvre_.
DURING AND AFTER THE CRIMEAN WAR
However, the great Crimean war began towards the end of the next year
(1853), and L. N. Tolstóy did not want to remain inactive in the
Caucasus army. He obtained his transfer to the Danube army, took part
in the siege of Silistria, and later on in the battle of Balakláva,
and from November, 1854, till August, 1855, remained besieged in
Sebastopol--partly in the terrible “Fourth bastion,” where he lived
through all the dreadful experiences of the heroic defenders of that
fortress. He has therefore the right to speak of War: he knows it from
within. He knows what it is, even under its very best aspects, in such
a significant and inspired phase as was the defence of these forts and
bastions which had grown up under the enemy’s shells. He obstinately
refused during the siege to become an officer of the Staff, and
remained with his battery in the most dangerous spots.
I perfectly well remember, although I was only twelve or thirteen,
the profound impression which his sketch, _Sebastopol in December,
1854_, followed, after the fall of the fortress, by two more Sebastopol
sketches--produced in Russia. The very character of these sketches
was original. They were not leaves from a diary, and yet they were
as true to reality as such leaves could be; in fact, even more true,
because they were not representing one corner only of real life--the
corner which accidentally fell under the writer’s observations--but
the whole life, the prevailing modes of thought and the habits of life
in the besieged fortress. They represented--and this is characteristic
of all subsequent works of Tolstóy--an interweaving of _Dichtung_ and
_Wahrheit_, of poetry and truth, truth and poetry, containing much more
truth than is usually found in a novel, and more poetry, more poetical
creation, than occurs in most works of pure fiction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account